Jetting question... NO NOT THE SAME OLD WHAT JET SHOULD I RUN .....
#11
Jetting question... NO NOT THE SAME OLD WHAT JET SHOULD I RUN .....
I'm always confuesd LOL[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] The power seems to be better. Beat up on a bunch of people at Silver Lake[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img] Stayed side by side with a real nice 250R [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img] Don't think he was to happy, Didn't go a second time[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
#12
#15
#16
Jetting question... NO NOT THE SAME OLD WHAT JET SHOULD I RUN .....
170 DJ main sounds lean to me. I run 200 now but will be knocking it down to 195 or 190. I don't run lid or snorkels. I also uped the pilot jet to 45, I think I got better response out of the 45. I can't understand why yourbike would be rich when the 170 DJ is leaner than the stock mikuni 165.
#17
Jetting question... NO NOT THE SAME OLD WHAT JET SHOULD I RUN .....
Pushin, if you look at buttfungus's web site and go to the mikuni vs. dynojet section you'll see that you are already leaner on the main by between 2 -3 sizes ! If your plugs look good don't mess with it , unless your a pro racer and need every ounce of h.p. you can get. You should leave the lid on and snorkles too . I could not tell the difference either way in h.p. just alot more noise ! I let my buddy ride it and he said it reved quicker with the lid and snorkles on ! Now I need a damn cdi box because I am constantly on the rev limiter now with a hmf slip on .
#18
#19
#20
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)