What stroke is the 760?
#21
[quote]
Originally posted by: DuneMe
[quote]
[i]
The 703mm is a stock jug that is bored to 102mm and re niked. I don't think the cylinder height is any different.
I thought the 102mm bore is a 680!? That's what I heard from everyone.. Or are you talking about that bore and a stroke too?
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
Originally posted by: DuneMe
[quote]
[i]
The 703mm is a stock jug that is bored to 102mm and re niked. I don't think the cylinder height is any different.
I thought the 102mm bore is a 680!? That's what I heard from everyone.. Or are you talking about that bore and a stroke too?
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]
#24
No need to use spacers and all that crazy stuff. I would just shorten the rod a little or order my pistons with the pin location moved up etc. I think the best way would be to shorten the rod then any stock bore guy could use it or the 720 bikes could also use it making them about 783cc. All the friction talk is slightly true but the advantage of more leverage against the crank by stroking always out weighs the small amount of friction increase. If the crank is stroked 7mm then the rod would have to be shortened 3.5mm which would barely be noticable to the naked eye. This gives a 1.52:1 rod ratio which is the same as a small block chevy using the 3.75 crank and 5.7 rod, there's a pile of them running in drag cars.
MrHorsepower
MrHorsepower
#27
Haven't you guy figured out how to build torque yet? Long rod , short rod, it don't matter.
Torque in a bottle! NOS [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
J Ross
Torque in a bottle! NOS [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
J Ross



