Is this true 300 ft dragsters?
#31
Originally posted by: sandbomber
Dont tell recoop Im gonna sprinkle some on his bike[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
Dont tell recoop Im gonna sprinkle some on his bike[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
#32
Originally posted by: ANNIHILATER
2 Years ago would have sworn MR HP 650 ran a 4.6 in 300ft on all motor and stock frame, After some research I came to the the conclusion that his bike must have weighed near a whopping 400lbs. I wish Eric would correct me if im wrong. This was a built stock bore around the same weight as my bike. Im gonna run 300ft soon and was wondering what some good times were for my similar set up. I know Eric is good on the light, But for that heavy of a bike NOT being on nos that seems like a good # for a stock bore stock chassis. Anyone know?
2 Years ago would have sworn MR HP 650 ran a 4.6 in 300ft on all motor and stock frame, After some research I came to the the conclusion that his bike must have weighed near a whopping 400lbs. I wish Eric would correct me if im wrong. This was a built stock bore around the same weight as my bike. Im gonna run 300ft soon and was wondering what some good times were for my similar set up. I know Eric is good on the light, But for that heavy of a bike NOT being on nos that seems like a good # for a stock bore stock chassis. Anyone know?
You would be very close to accurate- if memory serves it was a little under 400, no paddles (and spinning like crazy). He ran a 4.7 with the exact same setup on a single carb. All testing seemed to stop there, so we may never know?
By the way, how ya'll been?
222
#33
Originally posted by: 222
You would be very close to accurate- if memory serves it was a little under 400, no paddles (and spinning like crazy). He ran a 4.7 with the exact same setup on a single carb. All testing seemed to stop there, so we may never know?
By the way, how ya'll been?
222
Originally posted by: ANNIHILATER
2 Years ago would have sworn MR HP 650 ran a 4.6 in 300ft on all motor and stock frame, After some research I came to the the conclusion that his bike must have weighed near a whopping 400lbs. I wish Eric would correct me if im wrong. This was a built stock bore around the same weight as my bike. Im gonna run 300ft soon and was wondering what some good times were for my similar set up. I know Eric is good on the light, But for that heavy of a bike NOT being on nos that seems like a good # for a stock bore stock chassis. Anyone know?
2 Years ago would have sworn MR HP 650 ran a 4.6 in 300ft on all motor and stock frame, After some research I came to the the conclusion that his bike must have weighed near a whopping 400lbs. I wish Eric would correct me if im wrong. This was a built stock bore around the same weight as my bike. Im gonna run 300ft soon and was wondering what some good times were for my similar set up. I know Eric is good on the light, But for that heavy of a bike NOT being on nos that seems like a good # for a stock bore stock chassis. Anyone know?
You would be very close to accurate- if memory serves it was a little under 400, no paddles (and spinning like crazy). He ran a 4.7 with the exact same setup on a single carb. All testing seemed to stop there, so we may never know?
By the way, how ya'll been?
222
[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
#34
Originally posted by: amd
I remember all the hype on that. I must say I like that bike better then the 855 drag bike. You know its like street cars. Yeah the all out drag cars are cool and all, but the 9 sec street cars are much more impressive.....D
I remember all the hype on that. I must say I like that bike better then the 855 drag bike. You know its like street cars. Yeah the all out drag cars are cool and all, but the 9 sec street cars are much more impressive.....D
222
#35
Originally posted by: DSNUT
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
222
#36
Originally posted by: 222
Wow, forever the optimist! Let's see, the closest thing we have so far is Choose drag frame NOS at 4.6 and Eric's stock frame motor 4.6. Six tenths is a long way to go in 6 months!!! And.... there hasn't been much research or testing lately on the stock bore..... has there?
222
Originally posted by: DSNUT
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
222
I dont mean to toot my own horn. But guys, lets remember, we are seeing history made with a bone stock engine. It will be a stock bore soon. But NOT until I get one more shot to break into the 4.5's.
Its a great comparison for all of us to consider. Eric's stock bore=77hp approx 380lbs
Scott's stock engine + NOS=72hp approx 310lbs
This is a great feat for both bikes. No doubt about it.
#37
Ive ALWAYS like all motor to motor races. Sometimes we have to even the odds. But the feeling you get when its all motor and its takin names is a great feeling.
And I am willing to go out on a limb and say that in the next 8 months my bike will run 4.1 on all motor at 365 lbs. NO NOS...!!! Stock bore stock stroke...
We will be testing a whole new stock bore here soon... sending her off in the next 4 months... The the bar will be raised beyond belief.
I beleive with paddles and nos the stock bore of erics could have done much better. I noticed others were running paddles. But he wasnt.
Choos- Good job on the #s. I think its torq to weight ratio.
And I am willing to go out on a limb and say that in the next 8 months my bike will run 4.1 on all motor at 365 lbs. NO NOS...!!! Stock bore stock stroke...
We will be testing a whole new stock bore here soon... sending her off in the next 4 months... The the bar will be raised beyond belief.
I beleive with paddles and nos the stock bore of erics could have done much better. I noticed others were running paddles. But he wasnt.
Choos- Good job on the #s. I think its torq to weight ratio.
#38
Originally posted by: 222
Wow, forever the optimist! Let's see, the closest thing we have so far is Choose drag frame NOS at 4.6 and Eric's stock frame motor 4.6. Six tenths is a long way to go in 6 months!!! And.... there hasn't been much research or testing lately on the stock bore..... has there?
222
Originally posted by: DSNUT
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
222
#40
Originally posted by: 222
Wow, forever the optimist! Let's see, the closest thing we have so far is Choose drag frame NOS at 4.6 and Eric's stock frame motor 4.6. Six tenths is a long way to go in 6 months!!! And.... there hasn't been much research or testing lately on the stock bore..... has there?
222
Originally posted by: DSNUT
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
I was skeptical at first but I am convinced now we will see a stock bore, stock stroke on NOS in the 4.0's or less in the next 6 months[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
222
On this, however, I think I am accurate[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] I know the guy gunning for this and he is not the kind of guy to give up[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]


