General Chat Ask for ATV help above in the Brand Discussions Area. Use this forum to discuss Life, Music, ETC. Or discuss pretty much anything BUT no political or religious threads. There's an area for that.

Suzuki 400 and Honda 400 Questions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 16, 2009 | 10:52 PM
  #1  
TheKaos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki 400 and Honda 400 Questions

(07 through 09 models) Out of the two what has more bottom end throttle? I know the zukis liquid cooled and honda is air cooled. What one would you say to be more reliable? I heard the suzuki is a little faster but the honda is a wheelie machine. How little is the top speed differences between the two?
Thanks.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 02:49 AM
  #2  
hotblooded's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
From: Westcentral WI
Default

Having owned a 05 dvx and a 03 400ex I would say the Honda has more bottom end. I would say that the Cat prolly has a little more on the top but it wouldn't be a lot. As far as a wheelie machine, that is one reason that got rid of the cat, you couldn't keep the front down.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:23 AM
  #3  
ss97's Avatar
Pro Rider
Lets Ride!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 1
Default

Well I cannot say for the '09 z400 as they have supposedly increased low end.

But for the other years the 400ex has more low end, but the z400 kills it on top. And with a nice slip-on the z400 low end picks right up to a nice trail level.

Top speeds they are both around the same give or take a couple MPH and conditions.

They are both nice, but the z400 has more potential and much better suspension in stock form.

Reliability they are both very good..... the 400ex is a legend in that area, but the z400 has made a pretty nice history for itself too. With proper maintenance I think they are probably equally reliable with perhaps the 400ex getting a slight edge due to its simplicity of being air-cooled (less to break) and being a push-rod engine (again less to break) .....but the valves on the 400ex need adjusting a lot more too which is added maintenance in that aspect.......
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 10:46 AM
  #4  
scootergptx's Avatar
Supersock
Hired Gun!
"Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!"
20 Year Member
Active Streak: 30 Days
Community Builder
Community Influencer
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 142,494
Likes: 182
From: Land of the misfit toys
Default

With the 09 Z being EFI now, I'd take it and it you need to, just make a simple sprocket change to get a little more lower end.
 
Reply
Old Apr 17, 2009 | 11:55 PM
  #5  
TheKaos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

Thanks for all the info guys. What about the 450 models? Is there quite a difference in pros and cons? Would honda have a slight more reliable 450 engine, and suzuki have a little more top speed? I would think jumping up to a 450 race quad, they would all have drastic changes from the 400s. I care a lot for reliability so who has a reliable 450 engine?
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cole Hadden
Polaris
25
Jun 15, 2025 09:05 AM
jaime511
General Chat
6
Jul 19, 2015 01:58 PM
ATVC Correspondent
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
0
Jul 15, 2015 02:07 AM
1966F100
Polaris
11
Jul 12, 2015 03:08 AM
tporath
CAN-AM (BRP)
0
Jul 11, 2015 12:31 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:38 PM.