what would be the outcome, are they really slow?

 

I think the Ranger is a little faster. I believe that the CDI on the Rhino limits its top speed

 

i dont know about a rhino, but i know my ranger does 45.....nice for goin the long haul down the road b/t farms...but if its gonna go that fast it should have one more lower range....for me.......just feels like its gruntin alot when in low.....but it does the job.....i just htink it might be easier on the machine..if there where..thats all

 

You should go down to your dealer, and try to get a test drive with it. Have them explain the differences. Ask for them to show you the video tape. I think you would enjoy seeing how polaris dominates that market. And make up your mind on which vehicle to choose.

 

in Nov/Dec there will be a 700EFI Ranger and that thing will be unreal!

[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

Just change the cdi in the rhino to a grizzly one. I've heard that gets a rhino in the 60's.

 

i think it's the same if that guys ranger goes 45 my friends rhino goes 45 i dunt think theres a difference

 

im glad to see you're brainwashed by that cheesy polaris video mr zeedler. you can tell they were being easier (or harder if that made the polaris look better) in ever situation. i dont know and dont care which is better, but i saw the bogus video and it is BOGUS

 

why dont you have any pics lt500?

 

Rhino tops at about 42mph.
The ranger is a better work machine
The Rhino is better at trail riding and 4x4ing
The Ranger has less problems (Rhino is not bad just some first year bugs - CV joints being #1)
I love my Rhino but if I was doing work all day I would get a mule, a lot of work and some trail riding - a Ranger, mostly trails and a little work - The Rhino.

They are all a lot more fun than most people would ever think, I REALLY like my Rhino!