Honda to replace Big Red with new Pioneer UTV
#21
The problem I had was slowing the quad down on a steep two-track trail that had ruts and large rocks that I needed to crawl over. (In this way Utah was like New England trail-wise) If I left it in 1st gear it would act like it's free wheeling until about 15 mph. On every quad I've been on in the last 10 years or so there was at least rear wheel engine braking that let you pick your way down the nasty trails at 3-5 mph.
I did return that to the rental place and used a Rancher IRS with power steering. The gearing was tons better on that machine and allowed you to crawl down steep nasty hills without having to be on the brake. Much better day riding that quad. Even then it was constantly squatting under my admittedly overweight self. No adjustment meant that I couldn't put more pre-load on the springs to make up for my size.
If you think I hate Honda I don't. I just think they could combine their reliability with more features including a 2-seater quad like I have now. My wife doesn't like to drive so when she goes with me I have to have that extra seat available. Adjustable shocks, good on-board storage options, and a 2-seater with more power in an ATV width vehicle might win me over. The Rincon left a sour taste, while the Rancher was average but still better than Honda's flagship quad.
I did return that to the rental place and used a Rancher IRS with power steering. The gearing was tons better on that machine and allowed you to crawl down steep nasty hills without having to be on the brake. Much better day riding that quad. Even then it was constantly squatting under my admittedly overweight self. No adjustment meant that I couldn't put more pre-load on the springs to make up for my size.
If you think I hate Honda I don't. I just think they could combine their reliability with more features including a 2-seater quad like I have now. My wife doesn't like to drive so when she goes with me I have to have that extra seat available. Adjustable shocks, good on-board storage options, and a 2-seater with more power in an ATV width vehicle might win me over. The Rincon left a sour taste, while the Rancher was average but still better than Honda's flagship quad.
#22
I bought the Rancher for the wife. She did not like the idea of being a passenger in the Pioneer all summer. I looked at the Can Am 2 up models but they are as much as I paid for the Pioneer. I do not care what people ride, it just ticks me off when people on forums run their mouths about this brand or that one with nothing but their non fact based opinion guiding them. If there was a perfect ATV or UTV every other company would be out of business.
#24
#25
#26
The payload rating on the Pioneer is 1000lbs and the tow rating is 1500lbs. Quit using Rincon numbers for the Pioneer. This is a different machine and is NOT a Rincon. Yes they used the same motor and tranny but it is not exactly the same. The shift points and gearing are different in the trans and the engine has been upgraded with a new intake. Instead of speculation and opinion go ride one. I have the 72in plow on mine and push snow over 18in deep without any strain on the motor. Like I said before I dragged 1300lbs of hay without a strain on the motor. I did loose traction a couple times but the motor/trans had no problem without the low range. that was not on wheels either, it was dragging throw 6in of snow on the ground. I suggest before you critique a machine you get some seat time in it. Otherwise your blowing smoke.
#27
#28
I have no problem with someone having a difference of opinion if it is based on experience instead of speculation. The problem lies when people say X is better then Y because I want it to be and I read it was. What is the point of having a forum to talk about these machines if it is all based on the opinions of people who have never ridden the machines they are talking about? I am not going to go on the Can Am forum and bash the Commander because I own a Honda. I have never owned or ridden in one but I read a lot about them when researching which UTV I should buy. I would never trash a product without having personal experience with that product. It makes no sense.
#30
Big difference in someone saying "I will not buy a Polaris because everyone I know that has one has had bad experiences" and claiming to know specifics that a product is "underpowered and needs a low range" or is "top heavy because I saw a picture of it".
I had a co-worker shred a belt plowing in his Ranger. Another had to sit on the side of the trail with his sportsman and wait for his belt to dry out. Yet another friend had problems with his Sportsman and the belt slipping riding on steep trails. These are REAL things that happened. I am not speculating on what I read or saw in a picture.
Everything I read in this post prior to posting was "what I read or heard". One person said that lack of a diff lock when the machine has a diff lock.
An experience constitutes first hand knowledge.
I do not claim to be an expert on Polaris belts but I know if I have seen with my own eyes or have close friends show me their problems it makes me not want one.
I had a co-worker shred a belt plowing in his Ranger. Another had to sit on the side of the trail with his sportsman and wait for his belt to dry out. Yet another friend had problems with his Sportsman and the belt slipping riding on steep trails. These are REAL things that happened. I am not speculating on what I read or saw in a picture.
Everything I read in this post prior to posting was "what I read or heard". One person said that lack of a diff lock when the machine has a diff lock.
An experience constitutes first hand knowledge.
I do not claim to be an expert on Polaris belts but I know if I have seen with my own eyes or have close friends show me their problems it makes me not want one.