Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Honda IS Screwing us..

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 09-17-2003, 02:12 AM
250R4LIFE's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 792
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

Originally posted by: 1986atc250r
Are we really getting screwed or is some misinformation being passed and big deals being made of little deals... Let's have a look...



(**Performance will not be as sharp as an equal sized FCR, but this carb is larger than the FCR used on the bike & will offer similar performance with slightly reduced throttle response.)

"I WOULD SAY IT WILL BE MORE THAN JUST SLIGHTLY REDUCED THROTTLE RESPONSE. I'VE SEEN FIRST HAND WHAT A DIFFERENCE THE FCR MAKES ON THE 400EX. NOT TO MENTION HOW MUCH SUCH A BIG CARB WILL EFFECT LOW END".


(**Since the stroke is longer and the bore is 2mm smaller than a CRF, it's likely that the CRF cylinder will bolt right on, giving you an instant, 470cc stroker engine with factory parts.)

"IT WILL PROBABLY NEED IT".

-----
(**Detuned Cam Shaft = Low Performance)

(**Again, this is typical of practically all ATVs - they slightly mild down the cam to provide better bottom end for quad use. This will not be a dramatic difference like the quad having a utility quad cam profile vs a full CRF design. Take the 400EX for instance, there are very minor profile differences between the 400EX cam and the XR400 cam. Certainly not enough to consider one "low performance" and one "high performance". Changes were minor tweaks.)

"THE 400EX MOTORS RUNS NOWHERE AS GOOD AS THE XR400 MOTOR".

------
**Steel Valves = Lower RPM Motor vs. CRF450 Titanium

One word.... Reliability. "ONE WORD..... BORING!!!!


(**Yamaha may have left titanium exhaust valves in their YFZ, but how much power do you really think that adds? Would you rather have a fraction of a HP, or a more reliable valve train.)

"I'LL TAKE THE HP!!!!!!


(***The CRF450R is equipped with "Pro-Link" suspension. Don't believe me? Check Honda's website. Pro-link is a generic term that refers to any Honda rear linkage suspension design.

Linkage does not increase travel, it controls how progressive the suspension action is.

In the past few weeks it's become very fashionable to "bash" Honda's rear linkage. Why so few complaints before then? Haven't the 250R and 400EX been the standard to which all others have been judged for years now? All the sudden their suspension design is crap? Has anyone ridden a TRX450R and know for a fact that it's rear suspension remains totally unchanged?)

"THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD POINT.


 
  #22  
Old 09-17-2003, 02:49 AM
reconranger's Avatar
Red Rider
Honda, accept nothing less!
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,733
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

Thor2-You have a source to back that up?? I have read a bunch of times that ATV's outsell everything else combined!! (But, I'm not going to look through all my old magazines just to prove it to you.) Anybody else out there have any info. Honda sold 70,000 Ranchers alone in 02!!
 
  #23  
Old 09-17-2003, 03:33 AM
Trx440's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

ATVs and Mule/Ranger's outsell all motorcycles combined. True dat.
 
  #24  
Old 09-20-2003, 11:35 PM
MegaCrash's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

All types of ATV’s combined into one total number may out sell dirt bikes, but there is no way ATV’s out sell motorcycles (Street, Race, Dirt, MX, ext,)
Its hard to find a garage without a bike of some sort in it.

 
  #25  
Old 09-21-2003, 01:29 AM
hondabest0nearth's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

Originally posted by: trx11t
And it continues... What do you guys think is he right???

"Performance will not be as sharp as an equal sized FCR, but this carb is larger than the FCR used on the bike & will offer similar performance with slightly reduced throttle response. "

So you are agreeing it is not as high a performance as the FCR Carb. If it was I am sure Honda would put it on the CRF since it is a much cheaper carb.


"We're talking a 2.7mm longer stroke here... This is by no means going to noticibly make the engine "slower revving". In fact, it's only 1.4mm longer than a Yamaha YZ450F. "

Again if it's not noticable why would they do it? And if it was more torque and it didn't effect any other part of the power band they would do it on the CRF. They just detuned it like I said.


"Again, this is typical of practically all ATVs - they slightly mild down the cam"

All ATV's except the YFZ450 which has the same cam as the YZ. Granted you have to do a 20 minute mod to get it there. But at least it's free.
Again detuned. Not CR Level Technology.

"Yamaha may have left titanium exhaust valves in their YFZ, but how much power do you really think that adds? Would you rather have a fraction of a HP, or a more reliable valve train? "

Do you really think Titanium is less reliable than steel? I would have to say they cheaped out and put the less expensive ones in it. And yes I think it will limited the amount of RPM that is achievable with this engine.
Again if it made no difference the CRF would use steel instead.

In fact I do not even know how Honda can claim this is a CRF engine. What is the same? Cylinder? No Head? No Piston? No Valves? No Cam? No I'll bet with the exception of the Valve cover and maybe the clutch cover there isn't the exact same part on any of it.
Look at the Yamaha all these parts are the same as the YZ450F.

"Linkage does not increase travel, it controls how progressive the suspension action is."

No it doesn't but less travel is less travel. When you are only dealing with 9 inches of travel and extra inch is absolutely a lot of travel.


I'll give you the aluminum frame comment. Steel is probably better anyway.

Bottom line is if you want the latest technology with all the highest technology for the best ATV for Racing the Yamaha is that machine.
If you want just another trail sport ATV than I am sure the Honda will be a fine machine. I stand by my statement. Honda is not giving the ATV rider their fair share. Yamaha is.

you actually think that honda will try to save their money and put the cheapest parts on the CRF450R derived engine. well i have to say that you are being totally biased. look at the budget of honda and then yamaha. honda makes more than twice the money yamaha does anually and they also have a bigger r&d department. so their has to be a good reason for honda to use them parts. by the way titanium valves and steel valves are just about the same. their isn't even 1/4 horsepower difference. so you can stop talking trash about the 450r. how the h#ll do you know that honda didn't use the same parts for the valve train. do you work for honda and know everything they do. no and you can stop being an a$$ about it to.
 
  #26  
Old 09-21-2003, 05:29 AM
440EX026's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

Right on the money, reconranger. Ask someone at the factories why ATV's are so far behind in technology compared to the motorcycles and they'd probably say "Well, most of the tech on ATV's comes from motorcycles, so just be thankful!"
Your correct on this (the parts not quoted too) and sooner or later, prob later the factories will have to turn around to where the $$$ are, but till then were not much more than a bunch of red headed step children.


Performance will not be as sharp as an equal sized FCR, but this carb is larger than the FCR used on the bike & will offer similar performance with slightly reduced throttle response.
Understood, but like many others I think I would only end up with the FCR in the end anyhow, and it would be easier if it was there stk.

take this as a good thing. Since the stroke is longer and the bore is 2mm smaller than a CRF, it's likely that the CRF cylinder will bolt right on, giving you an instant, 470cc stroker engine with factory parts.
Damn Gabe we think too much alike, and this was exactly the same thing I was thinking as soon as I saw the specs on the longer stroke. I know in a later post there is a comment about needing the 470cc etc but only time will tell for sure.

No need to get into the other points and counter points since the only one that really makes any damn difference is the linkage set up and if the design corrects the "kick" that the 400EX has then its a winner.

I have to agree with who ever said that not many have stk machines anyway and how so much of the yzf-crf comparisons being discussed is a total waste of time. There is no way that any of this debating is going to mean anything on the race track (mx or xc or ??) since in a few months none of the machines will be stock anyway.

Now how I really see it all is that if I was a damn atv magazine reporter/editor and was comparing machines by spec only and how that should relate to performance in both these quads in total stk form then I think there may be a slight advantage in favor of the YFZ, but since I am not a magazine editor etc and would never pretend to be thinking on leaving either of these quads in stock form this advantage doesnt mean @#%$. For the guy who is having to get the newest bestest performance quad and then just use it for trail riding in stock form this BS may mean something but for the rest of us who will not allow ourselves to be beat up and beaten etc by a stock machine would be changing most of the parts on either of these quads.

Knowing this and realizing that both would require full suspension, intake, exhaust, controls and internal engine mods to be competitive or perform to a level thats expected etc. you have to agree that all the little things that made the stock comparison lean towards the YFZ are now nothing but junk in a box in the back of the garage. That said it will be some time before we can call a champion and it is anyones guess at this time.

I have to admit I was expecting more from Honda than the current info avail shows, but beyond being "ugly" I am not having many complaints. Sure EFI or the al frame that were rumored would have been trick but all I was seriously looking for was liquid cooling, improved rear swing arm set up and more power "potential". The three problems I have with the EX fixed, and they delivered that. So maybe I am more satisfied with this machine than I thought but when the time comes it will deff be getting a new hood as this has to be the frickin ugliest front end I have seen, but maybe it just reminds me of the other newer ugly style.

Sorry for the sermon. and bring on the 470cc stroker [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 
  #27  
Old 09-21-2003, 09:55 PM
Quadfather's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

If anyone is disatisfied with Honda's past, present, or future offerings, the remedy is simpler than they think. Spend your money elsewhere.



I get a real kick out of these knowitalls that heard in sixth grade study hall that Honda is offering up a new racer that is nothing but pure junk, then come here and try to get thousands of ATV enthusiasts to jump on their anger bandwagon. If you don't like it, don't buy it. Simple as that.
 
  #28  
Old 09-22-2003, 12:09 AM
trx11t's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

The reason I can relate to what this guy is saying is if I ask myself these questions:

Would I rather have the high performance FCR Carb? Yes. Save me $500 bucks later.
Would I rather have electric start and still 350 Lbs? Yes. Why not?
Would I rather have more suspension travel? Yes always.
Would I rather have titanium valves? Yes even though some say there is no advantage.

Then I notice they put the same tires on this that are on the Raptor. These don't seem to be the hot ticket for GNCC or any other type of racing.

I have to agree with others that the styling is one of the worst looking things I have ever seen.

And finally I was holding out a little hope because I heard they were offering a $300 performance kit but that turned out to be a huge disappointment also because it is only a cam shaft and some jets. (Everything else in the kit is useless)

I guess Quadfather is right the only thing left to do is buy something else. I just made up my mind. I am going to buy the Yamaha YFZ450. It just has to much more to offer. Dollar for dollar I think the Yamaha will be so much cheaper and still offer more performance.
Sorry Honda to much of a disappointment to ignore.


 
  #29  
Old 09-22-2003, 01:05 AM
1986atc250r's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 645
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

Would I rather have the high performance FCR Carb? Yes. Save me $500 bucks later.

Actually a little over $300 for an OEM Honda FCR carb. Less if you consider you can sell the 42mm stock carb.

Hard to say how "bad" the 42mm stock carb will be. It might be surprisingly good - it might not, time will tell.


Would I rather have electric start and still 350 Lbs? Yes. Why not?

This is an "advantage" we can't qualify yet -- I haven't personally weighed the YFZ, but from what I've been told, it's real weight is far higher than the "claimed" 350lbs. We don't yet know how close the Honda will be to it's "claimed" weight.

We know for a fact the YFZ engine is no lighter than a CRF engine. Frame construction and materials are similar, so where is Yamaha saving weight? Makes a person wonder....

Would I rather have more suspension travel? Yes always.

Again, we don't yet know whether the published specs are true to life. Even if so, Action is more important than the absloute numbers. I've measured actual travel before and found that manufacturer specs are again, not always true to what they publish.

You're pretty naive if you believe that the published numbers are 100% legit and useful for absolute comparisons. Differences in the way things are measured, the marketing dept, deceptive practices, and any of a number of other untold practices can all skew the numbers and make them only useful for establishing a very rough baseline.


Would I rather have titanium valves? Yes even though some say there is no advantage.

Titanium valves do have an advantage - they are lighter. They also have disadvantages, especially when used on the exhaust side - they don't handle high temps well.


Then I notice they put the same tires on this that are on the Raptor. These don't seem to be the hot ticket for GNCC or any other type of racing.

And the stock tires on the YFZ are the "hot ticket" in GNCC or any other type of racing?

Here's a hint - the tires aren't the Raptor's problem.


I have to agree with others that the styling is one of the worst looking things I have ever seen.

Purely subjective. I have to wonder if your obvious bias toward the YFZ is clouding your perception of the styling.


And finally I was holding out a little hope because I heard they were offering a $300 performance kit but that turned out to be a huge disappointment also because it is only a cam shaft and some jets. (Everything else in the kit is useless).

Accessories offered by the manufacturer are never the best value. The value in the manufacturers kit is the jetting for the accessories involved should be very close.

I also have to disagree with the airbox and exhaust being "useless". We don't know the design of the silencer yet, the tip may open the system up significantly, hard to say at this point. On a 400EX, that tip would be useless because of the internal design of the silencer - my guess is since they are offering this, the internal design of this silencer is much different.

The factory vented airbox will also likely be nice. It will likely have baffling that will prevent water/mud from being able to come in direct contact with the filter. Cutting a hole, like many do exposes the filter to the elements - not good for engine longevity.

I guess Quadfather is right the only thing left to do is buy something else. I just made up my mind. I am going to buy the Yamaha YFZ450. It just has to much more to offer. Dollar for dollar I think the Yamaha will be so much cheaper and still offer more performance.

Sounds to me like you "made up your mind" a long time ago. I'm guessing long before the new Honda was even announced. Many of us have different reasons for the quads we've chosen and will choose in the future - I find it very difficult to believe that either the Honda or the YFZ will be a poor decision for someone wanting a competitive 450 class machine.

The great thing is that we DO have a choice now. Five short years ago our only choice was which color of Banshee we wanted.

 
  #30  
Old 09-22-2003, 02:31 AM
Trx440's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Kansas
Posts: 1,054
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Honda IS Screwing us..

When I imagine Gabe typing his responses, I see him in some superhero's outfit with a mask and a cape, fighting the injustices being performed by all the Yamaha super-villians.

Look up at the keyboard. Is it a bird? Is it a plane? No, it's HHHhhhhoooooooonndaaaaaa MMMMmmmmmaaaaann!!! who disguised as Gabe, a mild mannered I.T. guy from the great state of Missouri, fights a never ending battle for truth, justice and the Big Red way.

Dude, you should have been a Lawyer. And like you said before, if more people think like trx11 and go buy a YFZ then it will be easier for those of us who want a 450R to get one at a good price and not have to wait too long.
 


Quick Reply: Honda IS Screwing us..



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 AM.