Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

mudlites vs. 589 M/S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 11:23 AM
  #1  
angler's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 393
Likes: 0
Default mudlites vs. 589's

I am thinking about getting some new tires and wheels for my 05 Rubicon. Which do you think would be better for trail riding and some occasonial mud? Which one would last longer as far as tread wear? What kind of rims should I get?




 
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2005 | 01:06 PM
  #2  
Quadder79's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Default mudlites vs. 589 M/S

I had the same question 2 months ago when deciding what to put on a Polaris Sportsman. The mudlites are great because they pretty aggressive but very light compared to the 589's. We have 589's on our 98 King Quad and they are too much tire. Unless you're mudding most of the time, the mudlites would be best!
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 01:15 AM
  #3  
deerbuster's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Default mudlites vs. 589 M/S

i thought the mudlites were mostly for mud and 589s for trail and occasional mud or is it just anyones opinion?
 
Reply
Old Apr 29, 2005 | 01:54 AM
  #4  
HughJazz's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 612
Likes: 1
Default mudlites vs. 589 M/S

589's are more of a mud tire than mud lite. The 589's will last longer too
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jwkawi
Kawasaki
10
Jul 28, 2003 06:11 PM
1fitman
Honda
14
Jun 8, 2003 04:23 PM
yamaguy
Drivetrain, Suspension & Tires
4
Apr 19, 2003 10:32 PM
Mount
Kawasaki
6
Apr 6, 2003 02:24 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 PM.