Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

EX or Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 06:55 PM
  #71  
LTZ's Avatar
LTZ
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,718
Likes: 1
Default EX or Z

[i]Originally posted by: [b]1bad450r[/b
What is false that was stated about the Z-400? Timing problems??? They have them.. Corrosian??? Another problem.. Cracked frames?? Yup thats a Z/KFX for you.. If you want a good beginner/intermediate track bike or awsome play/trail machine the 400ex is the way to go. Not to mention the dependability of the EX is outstanding. If you want more than that, I dont see why you would take a little tiny step up in power and jump on a Z, especially with the problems that it has. If I wanted something better/faster than the 400ex I would definatly be looking for a 450, Raptor or a Preddy but surely not a Z. And the only reason Doug is still riding that damn Z is because Suzuki has taken there sweet a$$ time with there 450. Once again the EX is a better trail machine than the Z, the Z gets spanked on the track by the 450's and seems to recieve quite a few stiff slappings through the dunes and at the drag strip by the 450's, Raptors, Preddys, DS650's and Shee's.
Talk about bad info.
All the problems you stated are few and far in between. Yes the 03 had frame issues, all of them? NO. Corrosion? On the new ones I guess so. But I'll bet Suzuki steps up with a fix and/or recall and takes care of the customer. Talk to Yamaha owners about customer service!!
Timing issues? Again, not all of them. Just like you guys are asking for"Show some numbers with proof". What's the percentage of problems of units sold? Show us some #'s.......
The only reason Doug was still riding a Z is because he was still DOMINATING!!! Not winning, dominating. What's wrong with taking their time bringing out the 450? The Z is a top seller, and it's still winning races. I read in this thread somewhere where Honda took there time getting the 400EX out because they wanted to make sure it was problem free. Maybe that's Suzukis approach this time. I guess it's ok for Honda but not Suzuki?
The average rider out on the dunes may take a couple beatings by all the quads you mentioned but they should be! They're all bigger and more powerful! Show me any EX with the same mods as any Z and I'll guarantee it gets beat everytime up the hill or on the flats. The ones being built for racing by Sparks, FST and a few private builds do pretty damn well against all the other "race" quads. You'll be lucky to see any 400EX trying to run in the big races anymore, and if you don't believe me try searching this site and you'll hear mention of a Z or two but rarely(if at all) an EX.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #72  
1bad450r's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 540
Likes: 0
Default EX or Z

Originally posted by: LTZevil400
[i]Originally posted by: [b]1bad450r[/b
What is false that was stated about the Z-400? Timing problems??? They have them.. Corrosian??? Another problem.. Cracked frames?? Yup thats a Z/KFX for you.. If you want a good beginner/intermediate track bike or awsome play/trail machine the 400ex is the way to go. Not to mention the dependability of the EX is outstanding. If you want more than that, I dont see why you would take a little tiny step up in power and jump on a Z, especially with the problems that it has. If I wanted something better/faster than the 400ex I would definatly be looking for a 450, Raptor or a Preddy but surely not a Z. And the only reason Doug is still riding that damn Z is because Suzuki has taken there sweet a$$ time with there 450. Once again the EX is a better trail machine than the Z, the Z gets spanked on the track by the 450's and seems to recieve quite a few stiff slappings through the dunes and at the drag strip by the 450's, Raptors, Preddys, DS650's and Shee's.
Talk about bad info.
All the problems you stated are few and far in between. Yes the 03 had frame issues, all of them? NO. Corrosion? On the new ones I guess so. But I'll bet Suzuki steps up with a fix and/or recall and takes care of the customer. Talk to Yamaha owners about customer service!!
Timing issues? Again, not all of them. Just like you guys are asking for"Show some numbers with proof". What's the percentage of problems of units sold? Show us some #'s.......
The only reason Doug was still riding a Z is because he was still DOMINATING!!! Not winning, dominating. What's wrong with taking their time bringing out the 450? The Z is a top seller, and it's still winning races. I read in this thread somewhere where Honda took there time getting the 400EX out because they wanted to make sure it was problem free. Maybe that's Suzukis approach this time. I guess it's ok for Honda but not Suzuki?
The average rider out on the dunes may take a couple beatings by all the quads you mentioned but they should be! They're all bigger and more powerful! Show me any EX with the same mods as any Z and I'll guarantee it gets beat everytime up the hill or on the flats. The ones being built for racing by Sparks, FST and a few private builds do pretty damn well against all the other "race" quads. You'll be lucky to see any 400EX trying to run in the big races anymore, and if you don't believe me try searching this site and you'll hear mention of a Z or two but rarely(if at all) an EX.
My "numbers" come from personal experiance. The many friends I have had that bought the Z400 thinking that it was going to be great and all the bike did was fall apart on them. The ones that still have them are constantly working on them. Sorry but that is what i have seen so thats what I believe. You really think that when the LT450 comes out that Doug is still going to be riding a Z400??? Probobly not. He running good because the engine in the bike is highly modded and he is a hell of a rider. You could put him on anything with 50 horses that handles well and hes gonna ride good. And for your info I have beaten plenty of Z's at the local strip on a 400EX. Stock to stock and pipe to pipe. There really isn't that big of a difference in speed/power and anyone who knows these bikes definatly knows that. If I can get the hole shot sitting on a 400EX I'll own that Z and I just happen to be pretty quick off the line. I really dont see how you can call what I say bad info especially because you pretty much admitted that the Z has all the problems I stated. Sorry but anything that has to get recalled constantly I wouldn't want sitting in my garage. You have your opinion about the Z and I have mine. Sorry if I offended you, I love suzuki and cant wait for the 450 to be released but am getting aggrevated that it is taking so long just like many others. I use to have a Quadracer LT250 and that thing was a beast. Also I do a lot of racing around on my cousins RM250 so its not the Zuki that I have a problem with, I just have a problem when the Z is made out to be soo much better than the EX.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #73  
speedi's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Default EX or Z

How about we stop all the BS now. These two machines are both great, dependable, and lots of fun. Now everybody listen. NO MATTER WHICH OF THESE TWO QUADS YOU HAVE IT ALL COMES DOWN TO RIDER SKILL!! Thats it. Thats all. Theres no more.
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 08:16 PM
  #74  
RIDER11X's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default EX or Z

I guess Motox26 can back up his statement with proof........LOL! Hey better get someone to sell your 400ex for you. You wouldn't want to go riding on an INFERIOR quad.............
 
Reply
Old Dec 19, 2005 | 11:56 PM
  #75  
LTZ's Avatar
LTZ
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,718
Likes: 1
Default EX or Z

I guess since the Z has corrosion problems and the EX has this they're even now? Or because it's a Honda it's no big deal?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 12:23 AM
  #76  
KyJoe340's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default EX or Z

I would rather fix the reverse switch than have the coolant corroding the inside of my motor and leaking coolant in the oil, if I could choose between the two. Unfortunately I am experiencing some of the other KFX problems with my '03. No one can tell me any different, I'm living it first hand.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 12:47 AM
  #77  
midnite's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Default EX or Z

Originally posted by: LTZevil400
I guess since the Z has corrosion problems and the EX has this they're even now? Or because it's a Honda it's no big deal?
Thats funny, I geuss honda shouldn't have rushed the reverse set up for ex. They only had 7 years to get it right.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 12:56 AM
  #78  
midnite's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 583
Likes: 0
From: illinois
Default EX or Z

Originally posted by: KyJoe340
I would rather fix the reverse switch than have the coolant corroding the inside of my motor and leaking coolant in the oil, if I could choose between the two.
Who said it was just the switch. Could be the entire reverse set up, or even the whole tranny that gets replaced. But then again, since it's a honda it's a mild problem where only a few ex's are effected. In suzuki's case, EVERY z has a cracked frame, stretched timing chain, and water in the oil. I wonder how the z sells so well?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 01:22 AM
  #79  
RIDER11X's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 195
Likes: 0
Default EX or Z

Hmmm......let's see one problem that they install a kit and it is fixed, OR many different problems? I just might run out and buy a Z400 today.........I got a tool chest and the Z400 would give something I could always be working on! I haven't had much use for those tools with all of the Hondas I had. LOL!

Motox26, we are still waiting on your sales figure comparison..........I haven't forgot about you and all of your good reasons to buy a z400! LOL!

In a seriousness, neither machine is what anyone should buy for racing right now, as someone else has said. If it isn't one of the new 450's, then you may as well sit in the stands to be perfectly honest. (Except in GNCC racing of course where there are many classes for different machines)

 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2005 | 01:43 AM
  #80  
KyJoe340's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Default EX or Z

Actually the post you linked to said "have a kit installed". I havn't heard of the problem before this but I'm sure some info will come soon. Right now "have a kit installed" leaves it open ended but I doubt it includes replacing the whole tranny. Midnite you exaggerate every statement. "every Z has a cracked frame, stretched timing chain and water in the oil" No one ever said this, these problems are however documented and reoccuring. Do a search and see for yourself. Does the EX have some problems ? Absolutely but not to the extent of the Z. But you didn't say EX you said "because it's a Honda" which leads me back to what I said earlier, you're just on here to bash Honda and peeve as many people as possible with nonsense. You have some sort of complex because you cannot force your will on someone else and make them buy Z's instead of EX's. I trailride and the EX is just a better choice for me over my KFX. My KFX hasn't suffered any of the problems listed (knock on wood) I've been plagued with different ones. Even if my KFX didn't have one problem I still prefer the EX for my style of riding.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:04 PM.