I would not say, that Honda is so much better than Suzuki

See Suzuki Ozark 250īs performance in the Danube river (Hungary): http://www.quadorzok.hu/Duna_013.wmv (1.3 MB)
And Honda Rancher 350 (!!!) in the same place: http://www.quadorzok.hu/Duna_001.wmv (5.3 MB)
And once again the Ozarks: http://www.quadorzok.hu/atkeles.wmv (3.9MB)

I have tried both and the Ozark seemed to be better

 

So, you are an Ozark guy, who just posted this in the Honda forum because you didn't happen to have any homework tonight?????

 

Already yes.
But when I posted my first post I was more Recon supporter, because the Honda as brand seemed to be better for me.
But I wanted to know the differences and after all my experiences and information I got I gonna to buy the Ozark tomorrow.
Sorry for saying this in a Honda forum, but Suzuki surprised me more. I tried both of them in hard terrain, mud and water and found Ozark more suitable for it. What I liked: ground clearance (!!!) - very important and suspension travel.

 

hey good luck with ur ozark. I hear its a great machine. the only reason i was looking at the ozark, and recon was cause the wifey wanted racks, but i want a sport quad. i deserve one. for all the young teenager yrs driving a quad with racks. when all my buddies wouls jump higher. drive faster. and look better.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-blush.gif[/img]