z400 vs. 300ex
#1
03-26-2007, 04:23 PM
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
z400 vs. 300ex
Hey guys I currently have a 02' 300ex that I bought last year. Im down at school now and just found a buddy that wants to get rid of his 05' z400 I am a very experienced rider but just dont have the money for really nice bikes but this guy cant afford his payments and wants 2600 dollars for this 05' thats in great shape has a pipe. Is it worth it to sell my 300 and move up or will I not notice that much of a difference between the two.
300ex has a FMF pipe and KN filter thats it
300ex has a FMF pipe and KN filter thats it
#2
03-26-2007, 04:32 PM
z400 vs. 300ex
WOW!!! My uncle has a 300ex and I have a KFX 400, huge difference. I would make that deal in a heart beat. There is a huge difference not only in engine, but shocks, comfort, size etc. $2,600 is a smoking deal. The only thing I would make sure of is that it only has a pipe on it. I'm weary about modded crap that never runs right.
#3
03-26-2007, 04:45 PM
Red Rider
Honda, accept nothing less!
Honda, accept nothing less!
z400 vs. 300ex
The 300EX (along with its brother the 400EX) is probably the best tight trail quads of all time. They have torquey motors that can be lugged down and ridden slow in the rought stuff, plus its smaller size lets it squeze between the trees a little easier. If you mostly ride very tight trails, a Z would be a step backward.
If you ride a variety of conditions and especially more open country, then the Z would be a good choice.
If you ride a variety of conditions and especially more open country, then the Z would be a good choice.
#4
03-26-2007, 04:57 PM
#6
03-26-2007, 10:26 PM
z400 vs. 300ex
Originally posted by: reconranger
The 300EX (along with its brother the 400EX) is probably the best tight trail quads of all time. They have torquey motors that can be lugged down and ridden slow in the rought stuff, plus its smaller size lets it squeze between the trees a little easier. If you mostly ride very tight trails, a Z would be a step backward.
If you ride a variety of conditions and especially more open country, then the Z would be a good choice.
The 300EX (along with its brother the 400EX) is probably the best tight trail quads of all time. They have torquey motors that can be lugged down and ridden slow in the rought stuff, plus its smaller size lets it squeze between the trees a little easier. If you mostly ride very tight trails, a Z would be a step backward.
If you ride a variety of conditions and especially more open country, then the Z would be a good choice.
#7
03-26-2007, 10:45 PM
Trending Topics
#8
03-27-2007, 04:57 PM
z400 vs. 300ex
Originally posted by: reconranger
If you mostly ride very tight trails, a Z would be a step backward. .
If you mostly ride very tight trails, a Z would be a step backward. .
Not to mention $2600 for a '05 is a steal.
#9
03-27-2007, 05:38 PM
#10
03-27-2007, 05:53 PM
Supersock
Hired Gun!
"Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!"
Hired Gun!
"Badges? We don't need no stinkin' badges!"
z400 vs. 300ex
Originally posted by: kyledc18
im not sure what the currency difference is beween canada and the states but around here an 02 300ex is still worth a good penny and it sounds like you could almost buy the z for what you could sell the ex for
im not sure what the currency difference is beween canada and the states but around here an 02 300ex is still worth a good penny and it sounds like you could almost buy the z for what you could sell the ex for