what to buy
#11
the full name for the rubicon is "Honda Foreman Rubicon", so yes, it is a variant of the Foreman. However, when the foreman changed in 2012, the rubicon did not, so for now, there are some differences other than engine and tranny. the new foreman has a single shock in the rear and no low range. the rubicon still has dual shocks in the rear and has a low range. you can also switch to ESP mode on the rubicon, which acts like a 5 speed manual, "shifting" using the handlebar shift like a foreman / rancher / recon ES. the "gears" are preset ratio's in the hydrostatic transmission.
i have a 2009 rubicon, 2010 rancher, and a 2005 polaris ATP (the predecessor to the sportsman X2). the polaris has more power and a softer seat. the honda wins in everything else. i ride the ATP for an hour, then switch to my rubi, and the difference is night and day. granted, the rubi is 4 years newer and has power steering, but the overall craftsmanship and ergonomics are superior on the honda in my opinion. i do use both the rubi and polaris for work, and both pull their weight in that department.
ride them and do your research. good luck!
i have a 2009 rubicon, 2010 rancher, and a 2005 polaris ATP (the predecessor to the sportsman X2). the polaris has more power and a softer seat. the honda wins in everything else. i ride the ATP for an hour, then switch to my rubi, and the difference is night and day. granted, the rubi is 4 years newer and has power steering, but the overall craftsmanship and ergonomics are superior on the honda in my opinion. i do use both the rubi and polaris for work, and both pull their weight in that department.
ride them and do your research. good luck!
#14
Congratulations. Honda makes great quads.
#17
you're asking people in a honda forum if you should buy a honda or a polaris??? 
I'd go with the polaris personally- I'd rather have an IRS, a cvt clutch and a locking front diff...

I'd go with the polaris personally- I'd rather have an IRS, a cvt clutch and a locking front diff...







