Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Whats better a 400 EX or the 350 Warrior?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-02-2001 | 10:15 PM
ndrider's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Default

Hey guys I am thinking of getting a new quad and I am curious which of these quads is the better trail machine? I am leaning towards the Warrior do to no reverse on the Honda. How does the power compare between the Warrior and the 400EX?
I haven't ridden one in about 6 years, since I sold my Suzuki 250. Thanks in advance...
 
  #2  
Old 04-02-2001 | 10:33 PM
radgumby350's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
Default

i would recamend the 400ex! no question! i had a warrior and did not like it. the 400ex has lots of room to grow.i feel that the warrior is a tank do to the weight of it. one minor set back on the 400ex is the reverse but it is worth it. the 400ex is an awesome bike!!!!!!!
 
  #3  
Old 04-03-2001 | 12:10 PM
moto93's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 352
Likes: 0
Default

The Warrior having reverse is the only thing it has over the 400EX. In everything else there is no contest... The 400 kicks the Warriors ***!
 
  #4  
Old 04-03-2001 | 03:17 PM
MIA400EX's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default

400EX Warrior
------------------ -----------------
~26 HP ~17 HP
~65 MPH top speed ~55 MPH Top speed
killer suspension tank
butter-smooth tranny notchy at best
no reverse reverse
Honda Yamaha

There is no comparison.
 
  #5  
Old 04-03-2001 | 04:40 PM
wheeliedude's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Default

I might also add that the honda responds better to hop ups,(4 valves instead of two), and the design is much newer. The ex will run away from a warrior in most situations, even a modded warrior.
 
  #6  
Old 04-03-2001 | 09:50 PM
99500scrambler's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
Default

I just bought a 400ex and my buddie who rides with me 90% of the time I ride has a warior with a k&n air filter and a 14 toothe front sproket for winter riding and our top end is identical but I beat him there. In my opinion the honda suspention and whole chasise layout is much better. His seat is a little softer. Not having reverse is no big deal. The machine is light enough that you can either push it back or just pick-up the front and swing it around.
 
  #7  
Old 04-04-2001 | 03:13 AM
WildTurkey's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Default

I prefer the Warrior. I've got my reasons. Reasons, good enough that I bought a Warrior instead of the 400ex.
 

Trending Topics

  #8  
Old 04-04-2001 | 05:55 AM
Faraday's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 55
Likes: 0
Default

I also bought a Warrior because of it's history. There are alot of valid points on this thread though. I guess one could say the Warrior is sporty and the Ex is sportier. Depends on your style. See also the Yamaha postings.
 
  #9  
Old 04-04-2001 | 11:15 AM
fasttrax's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
Default

or a yugo and a vette.... of course the 400ex.
 
  #10  
Old 04-04-2001 | 12:00 PM
exer's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Default

Either one would be a real good choice.

Exer
 


Quick Reply: Whats better a 400 EX or the 350 Warrior?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 PM.