I would go with the 300ex, it has better suspension which will give u a better ride in the trails

 

Now this is the way a forum is supposed to work...no bashing, trashing of each other or their rides.Just sticking to the topic & stating their preferences.
To certain others(and you know who you are),review this thread whenever you're prompted to go off on a tangent!

THE AZ HARD PACKER, calmiller@kachina.net

------------------
save your riding area! join the Blue Ribbon Coalition online @www.sharetrails.org



[This message has been edited by hot_shoe_cv (edited 10-14-1999).]

 

The 300 EX is better for trails by a long shot. It has better shocks, better turning in the sharp woods, and who can 4-get that easy clutch?

------------------

 

Rob,

Get the 400ex. The only thing missing is reverse, but you get a much more capapble machine.

If not the 400, then the 300, as I mentioned before.

RM

------------------
99 400EX 95 Scrambler 400 85 LT250R

 

I'm glad to see this subject getting discussed. I'll be getting the Mrs. a quad soon and these are the two that I'm looking at.

Oh, and Cal's right, this is the way the forums are supposed to work. Probably because no one mentioned a particular brand of quad made in MN...

SandmanBlue

[This message has been edited by SandmanBlue (edited 10-20-1999).]

 

I own a 98 300EX. I have ridden a couple people's Warriors and I still like the 300 better. It feels so much lighter, suspension is better, and the turning radius is great! I put a pipe, K&N filter, DynoJet kit, White Brothers E-Series pipe, and some ITP Holeshot XCTs on mine and it goes just about anywhere you want it to and without any problems.

Chad Ruehl
98 300EX (slightly modified)
http://www.isoc.net/chadly

[This message has been edited by mudfly (edited 10-22-1999).]