Honda Discussions about Honda ATVs.

Foreman ES vs S vs Rubicon

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-20-2002 | 05:01 PM
ScooterScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Default

I am going to buy a new ATV and want opinions about the Foreman ES, S, Rubicon. Is the reliability in the Rubicon? How about the ES electric shift? Sure there is a price difference but are the differences worth it? I think the ES shifts great, the Rubicon full-time 4-wheel drive is a negative. Help!!!
 
  #2  
Old 06-20-2002 | 08:57 PM
2fat4moto's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Default

KAWASAKI!
 
  #3  
Old 06-20-2002 | 09:48 PM
FastMud's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Default

If you have the cash, go with the Rubicon..

My cousin has a 2001 450 ES and I have an 02 Rubicon. The difference is like night and day. When in the ES mode, the Rubi is the smoothest shifting ATV you will ever find. And in the Automatic mode, you never hear the tranny shift.The only thing the 450 has going for it is the Trax Loc option. You can always add the warn unlocker to the Rubicon later.

Plus the Rubicon has a bigger engine and more ground clearance.
 
  #4  
Old 06-21-2002 | 12:02 PM
Specta's Avatar
Pro Rider
Loves riding and can't get enough.
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,949
Likes: 2
Default

I have ridden my sisters 450 ES and it id a completely different machine than the Rubicon. My wife thought our Rubicon was hard to steer until she drove the 450, it is alot tougher to steer. The Rubicon is just bigger, more powerful, smoother, and there is no comparison in the transmission department, the Rubicon has the nicest trans of all ATVs.

I have a new Rancher ES 4X4 and I would rather ride that than the 450. The 450 does have cosiderable more power (a lot of torque) than the Rancher, but I just don't find the 450 enjoyable. The 450 ES that I have riden is a 2001. When my sister drove our Rubicon she said she told her husband to get the Rubicon (after all, don't women know best!!) but he didn't because at the time it was a "new" machine. They are now in the process of "upgrading" to a Rubicon.

Alot of people do like the 450, but I do believe the Rubicon is alot more refined than the other Foremans.
 
  #5  
Old 06-21-2002 | 06:37 PM
TEXMud's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
Default

If your Rubicon is tough to steer you need to adjust your toe-out settings.
 
  #6  
Old 06-21-2002 | 11:39 PM
scosho's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 289
Likes: 0
Default

450S-Lighter, better power-to-weight ratio, simpler, more reliable in the long haul. Costs less, less to go wrong. The other day I had an electric shift module fail during a training class, the rider had to put the optional foot shifter on it just to get it in neutral so it would start. The machine had to be shifted by hand on the foot shifter, so he just left it in 3rd gear and rode the course. The shift lever fell off several times, and the whole class had to stop to search the range for it. I finally duct-taped the shifter to the shaft to sort of held it in place for the last hour of class. I expect mechanical problems from Suzukis, Kaws and even Yamahas in training sessions, but Hondas are the most consistently reliable. Moral of story: When the electric or auto shift fails, you can't even start the machine.
 
  #7  
Old 06-22-2002 | 12:27 AM
Sakoluver's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

The 02 Rubicon will start in any gear but reverse.
The 450 S would have to be a lot better than my Foreman 400 to even be close to the Rubicon.
 
  #8  
Old 06-22-2002 | 04:24 AM
redrum's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default

450s without a doubt
 
  #9  
Old 06-22-2002 | 07:52 AM
redwood's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
Default

I have a 2002 450ES and think its a great quad. Keep in mind alot of people have older Foremans which don't have traxloc or the new front diff. Personally not sure that I would want a hydro tran. Robs some power and fuel economy plus more to go wrong.
 
  #10  
Old 06-22-2002 | 07:49 PM
perrya's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 144
Likes: 0
Default

I don't know about the rubicon but my buddy just bought a new foreman and it is way too slow for my blood.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
95wolv
Honda
7
09-27-2024 12:00 PM
Johnny Mac
Honda
5
08-15-2019 03:13 PM
mark23
Honda
5
10-01-2015 09:57 AM
patrick.oc123
Honda
2
09-16-2015 03:45 AM
patrick.oc123
General Chat
0
09-15-2015 02:45 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Foreman ES vs S vs Rubicon



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.