text deleted by moderator
This type of question invites argumentative and derogatory replies, which is contrary to the purpose of this forum. Please confine your posts to those of a positive and helpful nature. Thanks for your cooperation,

 

I would say the Bayou 300. I couldn't even tell you if its right though.

 

suzuki quadrunner 250 4x4. great quad, just a little slow.

 

The Suzuki 250 is by no means a slow quad. It will do easily close to 50. I've beaten a Honda TRX300 before. They are a great quad and they are not slow maybe acceleration wise but top speed is quite good for a small bore machine. Bayou 300's go maybe 40-45.

 

Arctic Cat 4x4 40-43 on pavement

 

This award goes to the Suzuki Quad Runner 250cc 4x4.A close runner up would be its bigger brother,the KING Quad.Its AMUSING that Suzuki calls a 280cc 4x4 a KING quad?Sounds more like a QUEEN quad to me.And a 250 4x4 Suz can get no where near 50 on top end,UNLESS its sitting in the bed of a PickUp truck while cruising down the freeway.

Bill

 

I guess Kodiak78 is wrong...everyone says the Suzuki 4x4's are the slowest, I agree, my buddy's grandpa had one, you could run faster than them.

 

How about a timberwolf 250, or even a sportsman 335? I know that a suzuki 300 is really slow accelerating, especially up a hill, so I imagine the 250 is even slower

 

Yep,
a 335 Sportsman is slow to,but not as bad as the Suz 250 4x4.

Bill

 

Just another data point. My Suzuki 250 Quadrunner 4x4 does 45 easy, and at altitude. The few mods I've done to it give new meaning to acceleration on that little quad. It still may be the slowest at 45+. I read today that the TRX90 does 27. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

Mark