*goes outside and pushes down on the shock on his 6 year old quad* Still feels good to me. Ive been looking at warrior forums for the past 2 years and I still havent seen anyone say their rear shock was busted.

 

drag race not sure. on a trail 2 guys i work with have a 300ex and the ol mojave. 300ex as a great suspension. mojave it is quick for its size. bottom line is- my warrior or my buddys 300ex is leading the pack but the mojave can hang pretty good. i'd have to say on a trail 300ex - warrior- mojave

 

i read all those post just laughing. hondachode is the biggest idiot i think i have ever read a post from, the warrior is a great quad, super fast stock, very reliable, the shock isnt gonna just break on you, and thats his whoooole arguement, about the shock, what happened if a 300 ex shock broke, his is probably broken for all we know. now back to the orignal topic, what is the best, it all depends on what you want to do on the quads, if you want to drag alot, the warrior will win, if you want to trail ride the mojave will win, if you want to lose in both go with the 300 ex. my mojave "smokes" 300 exs on trails and in drags no porblem, and i race with my buddies piped one, so its not like i have more mods than him that affect speed, the mojave just has much quicker jump on trails and handles just as well, and the funny thing is, mine isa 1992 and his is a 2000, goes to show kawasaki knows what they are doing. i have another friend who has a piped warrior, i crush him on trails, the 300 ex beats him about 50//50 on trails, but when we drag or get out on long straights he pulls ahead. so that is my opinion on all this stuff. ride green, and screw hondaboys closed minded posts.

 

kawasaki....i thought it was speeled kawash!ty or kawasuckey. or somthing like that..

 

spballer, mabye if it was your friends first day riding, but mojaves get smoked by 300ex's ive test road them bolth when i was looking for quads

 

JEEEZZ, this is so easy guys..

Warrior: 348ccs, 6 speed, larger seating position than the rest and can be modded to 450ccs. the worst thing anyone can say about a warrior is that it's an old design.

300EX: 282ccs, 5spd, smaller ergos. Very nimble solid bike. It also is an older design and in need of an upgrade.

Mojave: 249ccs, 5spd, small but will carry around a 5'9" rider. any larger and you will wish for a bigger bike.

They dropped the price of the warrior $300 so it is probably the best buy and it has the most power and an extra gear. They all have reverse. I think the warrior has the longest suspension too.

Wait another couple months and you could probably pick up a 400ex in the $4500 range and be better than any of these.

 

well, i am 6'4 and 215, the mojave carries me just fine, fine enuff to kick a fmf powerbomb piped 300ex in drag and trails, when we switch up he beats me on it too, so its not a rider issue, its just that kawasaki owns, honda is good, just kawasaki did a few things better in the mojave

 

id like to see this on a video, no way a stock mojave can beat a 300ex-hell even if the mojave was piped it still couldn't

 

I have a 300 EX and a 2004 blaster...and have raced a 250 ex with both and it couldn't keep up.
your blaster has some performance stuff on it and can't beat a 250 ex? [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-shocked.gif[/img][img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-confused.gif[/img]

 

dirt boy ....kawasaki's are dogs!!! cant touch my 300ex[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]