roosthrower u are stupid a blaster is a piece of crap

 

yes i own a warrior and yes i've ridin 300ex's i'd prefer the warrrior( more power) the 300 is alto lighter in the front tho and a blaster i don't know what you ppl have been smoking but i watn some

 

Hondaman, goto a warrior forum and do a search on rear shock, none of the results will be complaning about a broken one. So a 300ex is a lil lighter and "more agile". The reverse is crap and only kids and small people can fit on it. Besides, if your buying a quad for MX racing and your looking at this lineup you need to do a little more research on the sport.

 

hondaman
You're right. the 250ex is way faster than a blaster and it keeps up with a 300ex. That 230cc motor that came out of a recon is smoking. And that driveshaft is very sporty. And the auto clutch is way better than a regular clutch. All sport quads should be auto clutch. And that suspension is great. Five inches of travel. You could do some serious jumping with that quad. I'm jellous. Do you wanna trade quads? Please

 

hondaboy101 i think your are dissing the warrior far to much. my only job i have ever had is working with wheelers and you think i don't know what im talking about. ummm oook. you can say whatever you want to but do you realy think anyones gona believe you? im not dissing honda at all im geting a 350x atc soon. but i just think you should watch what you say thats all[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-disgusted.gif[/img] don't get me worng ok man. im not starting anything everone has there own views on things and thats ok. forums and the atvworld would realy suck if everyone agered on everthing right.

 

lmfao......hondaman.....a 250ex can keep up w/ the 300...OMFG, what is this world coming to??

 

why is it always that the mojave is being compared to the bigger cc bikes? 300ex, warrior? maybe thats cause it is comparable to them. do you see any 250ex vs 300ex vs warrior? hell no. how about z250 vs 300ex vs warrior? no but this would be a tad bit better than that 250 ex by far. im not putting those bikes down they are good rides but just not in the same class. do your research before you start rippin on some quad without knowing the facts. when the mojave came out back in 87 it got great reviews in all the mags but now it dont get $hit. i think its the most underrated quad out there along with the tecate 4 but that did lack a good suspension but that thing FLYS yes faster than any of the other 250 2 strokes out there, stock of course. sorry for such a long post but i just had some things to say.

 

when i got my 250 i was running with mojave and now i run with the 300 now

 

300ex: good suspension, lighter, wheelies easier, better handling, top speed 55mph. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

mojave: crap suspension(whent to dealer yesterday pushed down on the back end didnt budge), heavier, harder to wheelie, not as good of handling, top speed 55mph. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-frown.gif[/img]

am i right

 

why you smile at the top speed of the ex and frown upon the top speed of the mojave when they are the EXACT SAME?