Kawasaki Discussions about Kawasaki ATVs.

lakota vs. warrior

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 02:43 PM
  #1  
Dr89's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Trailblazer
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Default lakota vs. warrior

as an all around atv which would be the better buy. there is a huge price diff. so i would have to buy the warrior used. im lookin at a lakota at the local dealer. i was thinkin on buyin it if i can sell my old quad (trailblazer) if it can even be called a quad. but any way around here there is mostly mild riverside trails we alot of fields to ride in and some home made mx courses. wht do u suggest.

thanks

Dr89
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 04:35 PM
  #2  
roosthrower's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Default lakota vs. warrior

both of those quads are heavy for mx but I would give the nod to the warrior for mx. The warrior will run at a quicker clip than the lakota. If you don't want to use a clutch go with the lakota. Using a clutch isn't hard though so I would go with the warrior. It is also like 40 pounds lighter.
 
Reply
Old Jul 30, 2003 | 09:18 PM
  #3  
clover's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,367
Likes: 0
Default lakota vs. warrior

well the lakota and warrior are about even in trails and fields,also there both rock solid quads these two atv's can take a beating and still be in good shape.For mx the warrior would be better with the manual clutch and the warrior tops out about 5-6mph faster,but if the lakota has a real good deal,i would take it,but if the price is'nt an issue take the warrior.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Reactant
General Chat
15
Mar 30, 2022 02:08 AM
STLyamwar
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
1
Jul 25, 2020 04:44 AM
Barnsnelbon
Yamaha
1
Sep 27, 2015 03:07 AM
Bernhard
Yamaha
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:45 PM
01ssls1
Introduce Yourself
4
Sep 22, 2015 06:50 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:03 PM.