lakota vs. warrior
#1
lakota vs. warrior
as an all around atv which would be the better buy. there is a huge price diff. so i would have to buy the warrior used. im lookin at a lakota at the local dealer. i was thinkin on buyin it if i can sell my old quad (trailblazer) if it can even be called a quad. but any way around here there is mostly mild riverside trails we alot of fields to ride in and some home made mx courses. wht do u suggest.
thanks
Dr89
thanks
Dr89
#2
lakota vs. warrior
both of those quads are heavy for mx but I would give the nod to the warrior for mx. The warrior will run at a quicker clip than the lakota. If you don't want to use a clutch go with the lakota. Using a clutch isn't hard though so I would go with the warrior. It is also like 40 pounds lighter.
#3
lakota vs. warrior
well the lakota and warrior are about even in trails and fields,also there both rock solid quads these two atv's can take a beating and still be in good shape.For mx the warrior would be better with the manual clutch and the warrior tops out about 5-6mph faster,but if the lakota has a real good deal,i would take it,but if the price is'nt an issue take the warrior.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)