BF or KQ?
#11
CAM650,
Like others said great write-up! With everything you mentioned I think the KQ will be a better choice for my type of riding. You said that you once owned a Polaris 700 so let me ask you how do you compair this to the KQ? I'm looking for the best all-around machine...you said it was better than the BF in this category but you didn't say if it's better then some of the others like the Sportsman, Grizz, etc.
As of right now I'm happy with my little Vinson but would like to get an IRS with EFI machine. Maybe I should wait for 2006? Does anyone know if there will be any new/upgrades coming out then? Thanks again CAM650.
Like others said great write-up! With everything you mentioned I think the KQ will be a better choice for my type of riding. You said that you once owned a Polaris 700 so let me ask you how do you compair this to the KQ? I'm looking for the best all-around machine...you said it was better than the BF in this category but you didn't say if it's better then some of the others like the Sportsman, Grizz, etc.
As of right now I'm happy with my little Vinson but would like to get an IRS with EFI machine. Maybe I should wait for 2006? Does anyone know if there will be any new/upgrades coming out then? Thanks again CAM650.
#12
Originally posted by: Outrage
CAM650,Like others said great write-up! With everything you mentioned I think the KQ will be a better choice for my type of riding. You said that you once owned a Polaris 700 so let me ask you how do you compair this to the KQ? I'm looking for the best all-around machine...you said it was better than the BF in this category but you didn't say if it's better then some of the others like the Sportsman, Grizz, etc. As of right now I'm happy with my little Vinson but would like to get an IRS with EFI machine. Maybe I should wait for 2006? Does anyone know if there will be any new/upgrades coming out then? Thanks again CAM650.
CAM650,Like others said great write-up! With everything you mentioned I think the KQ will be a better choice for my type of riding. You said that you once owned a Polaris 700 so let me ask you how do you compair this to the KQ? I'm looking for the best all-around machine...you said it was better than the BF in this category but you didn't say if it's better then some of the others like the Sportsman, Grizz, etc. As of right now I'm happy with my little Vinson but would like to get an IRS with EFI machine. Maybe I should wait for 2006? Does anyone know if there will be any new/upgrades coming out then? Thanks again CAM650.
I prefer the way you engage 4wd on the suzukis but I prefer the locker on the kawies The Kawie definitely has more torgue and a smooter running motor. There is no doubt these are the top 2 quads made with the prairie 700 there as well. They are aimed at 2 types of riders the Kawie has the top sport utility in the prairie's as is easily seen in GNCC racing, they wanted to make a machine more for the slower paced hunting , mudding , rock crawling class of people and they done just that with the BF. The BF has a more "tippy" feeling but as soon as you get in the real world it does not take long to realize that is not tippy.
All a person can do is read all the info , deside what they want from there atv and buy it. Which one is better is all determined by who is sitting on the seat. As for as I am concerned , I liked the BF better for myself but there is no doubt I would buy a KQ tomorrow to go in my shop if I win the lottery.
#14
Originally posted by: Outrage
Sorry Jeffro but we can tell that you are bias because of your post and you owning the BF. Good post CAM650 you hit the nail on the head.
Sorry Jeffro but we can tell that you are bias because of your post and you owning the BF. Good post CAM650 you hit the nail on the head.
#15
Jeffro,
I'm sorry my friend you missed the point again. Since CAM650 owns both I would have to say that makes him the expert. You can tell from his post that he is giving it to us straight and is not holding anything back. With out getting into it I say again thank you CAM650 for your honestly. I wish we could have more like you on this board because I'm quite tired of all the brand bashing.
I'm sorry my friend you missed the point again. Since CAM650 owns both I would have to say that makes him the expert. You can tell from his post that he is giving it to us straight and is not holding anything back. With out getting into it I say again thank you CAM650 for your honestly. I wish we could have more like you on this board because I'm quite tired of all the brand bashing.
#16
Originally posted by: Outrage
Jeffro,I'm sorry my friend you missed the point again. Since CAM650 owns both I would have to say that makes him the expert. You can tell from his post that he is giving it to us straight and is not holding anything back.
Jeffro,I'm sorry my friend you missed the point again. Since CAM650 owns both I would have to say that makes him the expert. You can tell from his post that he is giving it to us straight and is not holding anything back.
#17
I give up.
You love your machine as does everyone else who owns what they ride. Okay maybe the IRS doesn't SUCK but it just doesn't perform as well as other IRS machines. Since this is their first atempt at IRS I'm sure they will get it right the second time around.
You love your machine as does everyone else who owns what they ride. Okay maybe the IRS doesn't SUCK but it just doesn't perform as well as other IRS machines. Since this is their first atempt at IRS I'm sure they will get it right the second time around.
#18
Outrage,
Thank you for your kind words. As far as the KQ's IRS compared to others I would say that it's FAR better than the Grizz's. The Grizz is VERY tippy but comfy and doesn't corner near as well as the KQ. The SP series is very comfy and plush and handles very nice as well, it just doesn't handle as well as a KQ. The SP needs a diet more than anything, it feels and is VERY heavy. It's perfect for utility applications. I've never been on a Rincon so I can't comment on its abilities, but from what I've read the KQ and Rincon's IRS systems are the best available.
Jeffro31,
First of all, everyone is entitled to his or her opinion. I'm not putting myself out as an "expert" on the issue. I do own both so I do have a chance to compare them more readily than most. In my original post, I stated that the BF's IRS system does suck compared to the KQ's. I went on to say that it doesn't suck as bad as the Grizzly's but when compared to the KQ, it's far inferior. This isn't just my opinion, I've not heard one person, either in here or in an atv publication, state that the BF IRS is better than the KQ's. There simply is no comparison in this area. The only IRS system that might be as good is the Rincon. However, I've never had any seat time on it so I can't verify or quantify that statement.
You also mentioned that you hear a lot more people bragging on the BF's handling than you hear about it's misgivings. I strongly disagree with you on this subject. All I ever read on here is how bad it sucks and to make it half way decent you have to get new tires and spacers. You don't have to do that with a KQ. It powerslides like the Prairie in stock form. It's extremely plush and makes the rider feel comfortable in rough terrain. Can you really say those things about the BF? If your honest with yourself, as an owner of a BF, you would say no. The BF rides a bit harsh for an IRS suspended quad. It doesn't powerslide well at all either. The KQ's IRS is MUCH better in rocks and other rough terrain also. Listen, I own both and I prefer the BF, but the facts are the facts. I think you are just defensive about any negative comments being made about the quad you purchased. I see it all the time. All I was doing was reporting on tests that I ran personally. To say that I was "far off" on the subject is simply not true. I rode both back to back in varying terrain and conditions and clearly the KQ's IRS is FAR better.
Thank you for your kind words. As far as the KQ's IRS compared to others I would say that it's FAR better than the Grizz's. The Grizz is VERY tippy but comfy and doesn't corner near as well as the KQ. The SP series is very comfy and plush and handles very nice as well, it just doesn't handle as well as a KQ. The SP needs a diet more than anything, it feels and is VERY heavy. It's perfect for utility applications. I've never been on a Rincon so I can't comment on its abilities, but from what I've read the KQ and Rincon's IRS systems are the best available.
Jeffro31,
First of all, everyone is entitled to his or her opinion. I'm not putting myself out as an "expert" on the issue. I do own both so I do have a chance to compare them more readily than most. In my original post, I stated that the BF's IRS system does suck compared to the KQ's. I went on to say that it doesn't suck as bad as the Grizzly's but when compared to the KQ, it's far inferior. This isn't just my opinion, I've not heard one person, either in here or in an atv publication, state that the BF IRS is better than the KQ's. There simply is no comparison in this area. The only IRS system that might be as good is the Rincon. However, I've never had any seat time on it so I can't verify or quantify that statement.
You also mentioned that you hear a lot more people bragging on the BF's handling than you hear about it's misgivings. I strongly disagree with you on this subject. All I ever read on here is how bad it sucks and to make it half way decent you have to get new tires and spacers. You don't have to do that with a KQ. It powerslides like the Prairie in stock form. It's extremely plush and makes the rider feel comfortable in rough terrain. Can you really say those things about the BF? If your honest with yourself, as an owner of a BF, you would say no. The BF rides a bit harsh for an IRS suspended quad. It doesn't powerslide well at all either. The KQ's IRS is MUCH better in rocks and other rough terrain also. Listen, I own both and I prefer the BF, but the facts are the facts. I think you are just defensive about any negative comments being made about the quad you purchased. I see it all the time. All I was doing was reporting on tests that I ran personally. To say that I was "far off" on the subject is simply not true. I rode both back to back in varying terrain and conditions and clearly the KQ's IRS is FAR better.
#19
The BF is easily the 2nd or 3rd best IRS quad out, Here is the ATVs I have either owned or spent numerous hours on that have IRS , the KQ could be the best all around although the outlander is just as good or maybe even better, The BF is right there as is the Rincon for 2nd place ,the polaris is good as well but does not turn very well at a hard pace, the Grizzly is much more unstable than the others so I would place in next and the AC would be last . This is for faster paced riding like I do,in the MUD the AC would be toward the top if not on the top , the polaris and BF right there next , then the Outlander and Suzuki and grizzly. This is just my opinion since I may only have a few hundred miles on the others. Kawie could definitley make there IRS better no argument there , I may very well go back to Suzuki one of these days but right now Kawie appeals to me the most with the good suspension and the best motor ever made and the best brakes ever made and good ground clearence and a nice ride to boot. They all have there plus and minus you just have to figure out what you want out of you quad and research that type of riding.


