OHV Riders Rights and also Politics This forum is for political and open discussions only. Do not enter here unless you are willing to disagree with the statements made. What happens in this forum stays in this forum.

Obummer's EPA is at it again.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 05:18 PM
  #31  
beergut's Avatar
ʇsıʇɹɐ ɹǝʌolloɹ
Providing the enemies of the United States with the maximum opportunity to give their lives for their country since 1775.
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,284
Likes: 3
From: rindge, nh
Default

Originally Posted by MooseHenden
All the talk of solar, wind turbines, etc. is great but not if it's unaffordable to the average consumer. I'd love to have as many of these devices but, solar in New England takes a loooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnggggggggg time to pay back for itself, wind turbine where I live in a river valley would take longer, etc. I'm all for it. But, let's also use what we have today.

PS I wasn't to pleased with giving (Obama donor) several hundred (don't remember exact number) million dollars just to have them go belly up. Poof... our money is gone.

100%
 
Reply
Old Sep 21, 2012 | 08:34 PM
  #32  
jgar's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,971
Likes: 0
From: Gardner ma.
Default

In many ways you guys are right about solar and wind power costing alot to set up for public consumption.
But when it come to home construction having a house that will make the power meter spin backwards does not cost all that much. Until people like me mark everything up....
On a side note. I find it funny how people on cape cod dont want a wind farm. Iam left with the impression that most in that region are ultra liberal but their view is far to important.
My dad and I have looked into putting wind turbines on the 125 acre farm. Studies have shown his town is one of the best places in the state for wind power. For us it could be very lucrative as land owners.
Big bangs and fire make Beergut a happy man.
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2012 | 01:53 PM
  #33  
User492's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 20,641
Likes: 1
Default

I’m all for renewable energy as long as it makes financial sense. Currently it takes far to long for wind and solar to pay for themselves. We have all the oil we need right now – far more than any other country. The problem is the current administration won’t allow us to get it.

QUOTE: The Green River Formation alone “contains about as much recoverable oil as all the rest the world’s proven reserves combined

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gao-recoverable-oil-colorado-utah-wyoming-about-equal-entire-world-s-proven-oil .

This does not include Texas, North Dakota, Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, East Coast, West Coast, etc. etc. etc.



 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2012 | 03:38 PM
  #34  
jgar's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,971
Likes: 0
From: Gardner ma.
Default

Originally Posted by DeeDawg
I’m all for renewable energy as long as it makes financial sense. Currently it takes far to long for wind and solar to pay for themselves. We have all the oil we need right now – far more than any other country. The problem is the current administration won’t allow us to get it.

QUOTE: The Green River Formation alone “contains about as much recoverable oil as all the rest the world’s proven reserves combined

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/gao-recoverable-oil-colorado-utah-wyoming-about-equal-entire-world-s-proven-oil .

This does not include Texas, North Dakota, Alaska, the Gulf of Mexico, East Coast, West Coast, etc. etc. etc.
The only problem with that is it make to much sense....
A project like that could have the ability to start to pull us out of these crappy economic time. It would create tons of jobs, roads, pipelines, refineries, trucking. Towns would pop up where there were none and the rest of us would benefit from lower gas prices...
 
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2012 | 04:21 PM
  #35  
MooseHenden's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Well, golly JimBob!
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 40,210
Likes: 55
Default

Originally Posted by jgar
The only problem with that is it make to much sense....
A project like that could have the ability to start to pull us out of these crappy economic time. It would create tons of jobs, roads, pipelines, refineries, trucking. Towns would pop up where there were none and the rest of us would benefit from lower gas prices...
Yep, all the more reason the present administration shut it down as the Obama Interior Secretary's first move. They want this country to become like Europe with $10 a gallon gas (See: Henry Chu, the Transportation Secretary that doesn't even own a car.) So what, if our economy suffers because of it. This group either understands economics and wants to bring us down or has no understanding of basic economics and is feeling its way along as it goes.

Just heard this week that part of ObummerCare is that hospitals and healthcare providers are going to be fined for return visits by patients. Gee, that's going to really help the hospitals and doctors out.

My doctor retired when RomneyCare was passed here in Massachusetts and he started having to deal with the state. He was very frustrated about restrictions and non-payment. I can see fewer people wanting to become doctors in the future. Hope I'm wrong.
 
Reply
Old Oct 28, 2012 | 12:26 AM
  #36  
Lolumad273's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
Default

Aye, the Green River Formation is Oil Shale. It only becomes cost effective when the price of crude is up over 100 dollars a barrel, at least. Not to mention the amount of fresh water it takes to recover, which in that part of the world... is rare at best.

Recoverable oil reserves, in a perfect world, sure.

Also, the infrastructure for refining Oil Shale in a quantity to do anything for Global supply just doesn't exist. Canadians can't even produce enough Tar Sands to meet U.S. consumption alone, and they've dumped billions into it over the past 3 decades.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2012 | 06:22 AM
  #37  
Jaster94's Avatar
Extreme Pro Rider
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,224
Likes: 9
From: Texas
Default

why the global supply? we could do it domestically and lower our own costs here at home. if we make more than we consume, then send it out overseas.
 
Reply
Old Oct 29, 2012 | 10:51 AM
  #38  
MooseHenden's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Super Moderator
Well, golly JimBob!
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 40,210
Likes: 55
Default

Even if they just explore for oil here it has an effect on the oil commodities market. It's based on what the conditions will be 6 months to a year down the road. Any time you explore or open up new areas it will, at the very least, cause a small price drop. Whenever you close exploration it causes concern about supply and causes prices to go up. Also, if you don't give permits for more refineries to go online it will cause prices to go up. There are literally dozens of grades and mixes of gasoline because of EPA and state regulations. A big reason California often has the highest prices. You need there to be enough refineries to keep up with the different demands.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 03:51 PM
  #39  
Lolumad273's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 182
Likes: 0
From: Upstate NY
Default

The reality is that exploring for oil that is economically feasible to bring to market, is an exercise in futility. If you look at a graph of oil discoveries, you'll find that although we spend more now than we ever have on oil exploration, discoveries have followed a steepening downward trend since the '60's. We've thoroughly explored the globe, I'm sorry but oil prices will not come down, it's a matter of diminishing returns.

So explore all you want, speculate all you want, it's all artificial.
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2012 | 04:57 PM
  #40  
beergut's Avatar
ʇsıʇɹɐ ɹǝʌolloɹ
Providing the enemies of the United States with the maximum opportunity to give their lives for their country since 1775.
15 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 16,284
Likes: 3
From: rindge, nh
Default

Originally Posted by Lolumad273
The reality is that exploring for oil that is economically feasible to bring to market, is an exercise in futility. If you look at a graph of oil discoveries, you'll find that although we spend more now than we ever have on oil exploration, discoveries have followed a steepening downward trend since the '60's. We've thoroughly explored the globe, I'm sorry but oil prices will not come down, it's a matter of diminishing returns.

So explore all you want, speculate all you want, it's all artificial.

what graphs are you looking at?

unproven & proven oil reserves are being found on a regular basis-

what's "artificial"?

and who's this "we" you are referring to spending $$$ on oil exploration?

Venezuela? canada? Saudi Arabia? who's "we"? because it certainly isn't the USA searching for oil over sea's or in other countries.

you need to do some more research-
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:37 PM.