4-stroke's suck!!
#413
How does an lt-500 not wheelie? When i was 8 years old i was riding my friends and i was doin pretty fair wheelies for an 8 year old on it?
#415
Yes beech has unbelievable control and cool. even when he is all pissed off and talkin smack [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
#416
dude, doing a wheelie at 30 as long as u want is a matter of finding the balance point and getting used to it. a wheelie is simply getting the front end off the ground. as long as ur doin it on purpose, it's a wheelie.
on another note:
i came across something in my auto service text book today. (it's an old book so some of the facts may not be right) it says that some manufacturers were trying to make 2-stroke cars, that don't require mixing gasoline. they said that the oil would get to the crankcase via a pump. is this basically oil injection? i was thinking, why don't they jus seal off the crankcase so that the oil stays in there, and they jus have the fuel/air mixture enter in through an intake port or something? wouldn't this mean that you can have a 2-stroke, with it's power, but without mixing gas, or having emission restrictions? sorry if i didn't use the correct terminology. does this make sense to ne body? would it even be possible? to me it seems like a way to avoid having 2-strokes banned, while still keeping them performing like a normal 2-stroke.
on another note:
i came across something in my auto service text book today. (it's an old book so some of the facts may not be right) it says that some manufacturers were trying to make 2-stroke cars, that don't require mixing gasoline. they said that the oil would get to the crankcase via a pump. is this basically oil injection? i was thinking, why don't they jus seal off the crankcase so that the oil stays in there, and they jus have the fuel/air mixture enter in through an intake port or something? wouldn't this mean that you can have a 2-stroke, with it's power, but without mixing gas, or having emission restrictions? sorry if i didn't use the correct terminology. does this make sense to ne body? would it even be possible? to me it seems like a way to avoid having 2-strokes banned, while still keeping them performing like a normal 2-stroke.
#418
Show me a 4 stroke that makes this power
Wärtsilä Sulzer RT-flex96C
Cylinder bore 960 mm
Piston stroke 2500 mm
14 cyl Makes 108,920 bhp @102 rpm [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] Now thats power [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
Wärtsilä Sulzer RT-flex96C
Cylinder bore 960 mm
Piston stroke 2500 mm
14 cyl Makes 108,920 bhp @102 rpm [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] Now thats power [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
#420
last time i checked 20x800 = 16,000 which is not 108,920.. Maybe my math is off but its takes roughly 10 of those to = 1 wartzilla. fact is wartzilla rules with 2 strokes. and 102 rpms is pretty low rpm. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]


