<< ... You should just let the mags use your polaris for the shootout, .... >>



Seems to be a pattern here. Grizz? Does all of your information come reading ATV magazines while sitting on the family room couch? You do seem to base a great preponderance of faith in magazine shootouts.

 

Thor how do you come up with these idiot stories of yours. When you consider that most all polaris owners always refer to how some magazine ranked their quad the best,I'm just simply going by their standards. I rely very little on magazines,especially the types that allow polaris to be crowned king,after polaris breaks down during a simple test. Whats really sad,is the fact that the test quads usually have less then a 100 miles on them and you still have polaris exhibiting that world class reliability it has,by breaking down. The best part is this isn't the first time they've broken down during a shootout, the magazines even state that polaris won't even allow them to have the quad alone,they keep a polaris tech on hand to fix it,so it can complete the shootout.

 

&gt;&gt;Thor how do you come up with these idiot stories of yours?

+ Idiot?

Personal attacks will get you nowhere Grizz?

Stories? Don't recall telling any stories or tall tales. Maybe anedotal comments or opinions based upon actual riding experience with quads of all kinds, but stories?


&gt;&gt;When you consider that most all polaris owners always refer to how some magazine ranked their quad the best,I'm just simply going by their standards.

+ Here we go back to the magazines again.


&gt;&gt;I rely very little on magazines,

r-i-g-h-t!!

&gt;&gt;especially the types that allow polaris to be crowned king,

+ So if they don't agree with your opinions they are placed on the do not read list?

&gt;&gt;... &quot;the magazines even state ....&quot;

+ Like I said you keep referring to magazines... You will not doubt refer to the magazines again in a following post because Polaris owners will not be a credible source.

+Just because Polaris owners talk about their atvs and improving them does not mean that they are junk as you seem to imply. Polaris owners are not in a state of denial regarding maintenance and the reliability of their machines.

+ I looked for your good, solid, salient points of conversation over in the Yamaha forum but couldn't find any. Why is that?

+It would appear your main interest seems to be Polaris bashing and agitating Polaris Forum participants.

+Yet you say you were a Sportsman owner previously. Perhaps we could share your valuable insights and experience with both brands.

+(Polaris and Yamaha)

+Since you are rated as a weekend warrior soon to be trail blazer I am sure that you are uncorrupted in your outlook and opinions. I look forward to your contributions. (and your next reference to magazines)

 

Thor its fairly simple,you have all kinds of stories about polaris being the king on these forums. But the only source that seems to put polaris on the thrown are magazines.You certainly can't go by what a polaris owner tells you,because they'll tell you how great polaris is while their waiting to pick up theirs from the shop. If you look at this forum,you'll find plenty of sources that point to polaris being less then reliable or durable. If you look at what gets brought in for repairs the most,you'll find out polaris tops the list. As far as agitating people on this forum,you seem to be the one thats bothered the most,it must be because you can't stand to hear the truth about polaris. As I've stated before,I owned a sportsman before the grizzly and the sportsman had plenty of mechanical problems which were in line with what others have stated went wrong with their sportsmans on this forum.

 

Why is it every damn thread on this forum turns into a pissing match? If you don't like Polaris, stay in your own brands forum and start crap there. I like my Polaris. I give my scrambler HELL and I am not a small guy. It has held up well these last 2 years.

 

&quot;Wonder why Ford has dropped behind GM in sales, hmmmmmmm, I'm not sure.&quot; Well if Ford has 5 out of the top 10 selling vehicles in the U.S. I guess Chevy must have 6 or something? It's just like a Chevy guy to not be able to read or write. Oh wait you said GM, as in 5 brands -vs- 1 brand. Ok so maybe you can read, your are just ignorant.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

Gizz

Do you even know which is the best selling quad (gizz, interpertation how many idiots are buying junk atvs)? not the grizzly not the rubicon not the foreman,there's not enough of the rest to really matter.

 

i think the purpose of this forum is to meet different people around the country and share stories both good and bad. 99Griz, where do you live?

also, please post some pics of you and your machine!

Thanks!

 

Thanks 800twin,your response was really great.

 

<< &quot;Wonder why Ford has dropped behind GM in sales, hmmmmmmm, I'm not sure.&quot; Well if Ford has 5 out of the top 10 selling vehicles in the U.S. I guess Chevy must have 6 or something? It's just like a Chevy guy to not be able to read or write. Oh wait you said GM, as in 5 brands -vs- 1 brand. Ok so maybe you can read, your are just ignorant.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] >>



Yes, GM has 4 trucks in the counting&gt;&gt; 1500&amp;2500 Silverado, and 1500&amp;2500 GMC Sierra (as of the last count I saw, now may include 2500HD and 3500 Silverados and Sierras)
Ford includes the whole F-series in their count&gt;&gt; F150, F150SC, F250, F350, F450, F550, F650, F750, etc. etc.(I think there is a F800 or 900 now, not sure)

Anyways, the last count I saw was let's see, 4 GM's vs. 8+ Fords. Just had to clarify on that.