Sport Quads Discussions on sport quads.

warrior vs blaster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 04:58 PM
  #11  
footassmeet's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

hey i got a warrior and a blaster and a 300ex and i race the blaster with my friend and he beat me in the start but not in the end and my stock warrior beats a 300ex with a dg pipe
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2004 | 05:03 PM
  #12  
ss97's Avatar
Pro Rider
Lets Ride!
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,190
Likes: 1
Default warrior vs blaster

I've never lost to a Blaster yet, although a couple have been right there with me.
 
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2004 | 10:21 PM
  #13  
treylaxbanshee's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

i dont know why everone always think that blasters and shee's always need to be rebuilt every year or two, you people dont know how to maintain a quad. just as reliable as that four stroke you've got. That guys who tells you he has to rebuild his blaster every two years, put him on a four stroke and you will be rebuilding that one in two years too, it is all about the upkeep,,
just me thoughts
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 01:50 PM
  #14  
masterbalster200's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

where i live there are alot of warriors-z250-400ex's-and mojave's i raced my friends on there mojave-warrior-and z and i beat all of them i only had about a bike and a half on the warrior and i know my blaster has more top end speed then his warrior and i have not had to rebuild my engine yet and i ride just about every day and i ride pretty hard 2
 
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2004 | 03:35 PM
  #15  
impactrox92's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

blasters usually have better acceleration then top speed but they can be very fast. i know it is way faster than my new 300ex however the 300ex has better acceleration. i had a warrior and its close to the blaster but thats with a t-4 pipe
 
Reply
Old Sep 26, 2004 | 03:36 PM
  #16  
FdaDOT200's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

i have a blaster with FMF pipe and silencer and air filter and i raced my freinds warrior that has a T-4 w/K&N filter and my blaster was at least one quad length away. I agree with most of you that the warrior does beat it in top end, but the blaster's will take them off the line, now a HWD 240 blaster and a big bore 400 warrior would be a sick race to see...
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 08:36 PM
  #17  
Vinson581's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

it was me on the blaster, (fdadot200s) and him on my buddies 2004 warrior, with t4 k&n and dynojet kit. to make it fair we did it rolling in first, and then holeshot, the blaster came out everytime, and im telling ya the blaster has a hard time getting the frount end to the ground.
 
Reply
Old Sep 28, 2004 | 11:31 PM
  #18  
bigdawggg571's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Default warrior vs blaster

I had a 2003 Warrior with Big Gun Pipe , jet kit, kn filter, and my friend had bought a new 2003 blaster the same day I did, put FMF Fatty pipe and jet kit with kn filter, we drag raced, and he would get me bout a length until wide open I had 3 mph maybe on top side.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ahtatu
General Chat
9
Sep 28, 2015 12:14 PM
Barnsnelbon
Yamaha
1
Sep 27, 2015 03:07 AM
Bernhard
Yamaha
1
Sep 25, 2015 12:45 PM
01ssls1
Introduce Yourself
4
Sep 22, 2015 06:50 AM
nastyblaster100
General Chat
2
Sep 13, 2015 01:19 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:40 PM.