Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
May 1, 2005 | 12:32 AM
#71
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 626
Likes: 0
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
Originally posted by: Vunit
Yes man...your the best..it is just pissing me off listening to this f**ker rambling on about total bullsh!t...yea dude put all you bullsh!t words into one post....and no way in hell are blaster better than 400ex's and never a z400....lay off the crack....nice bars Banshee392..looks just like mine only in black...sweet blaster too..i like what you have done...
Yes man...your the best..it is just pissing me off listening to this f**ker rambling on about total bullsh!t...yea dude put all you bullsh!t words into one post....and no way in hell are blaster better than 400ex's and never a z400....lay off the crack....nice bars Banshee392..looks just like mine only in black...sweet blaster too..i like what you have done...
May 1, 2005 | 03:18 AM
#72
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
yeah i know blaster can be faster than 400ex and z400 but i was looking at it if everything were stock...its just the way nitsud said it "blaster are better than the 400ex and the z400 and everything else" you even know hes just trying to **** people off... but yeah there are some really sick blaster out there and have a ton of work done to them...my buddy had one and it ripped..that all im saying 5000 grand into it...
Jul 16, 2005 | 01:48 AM
#73
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
fastest is probably the mojave, but you can get a lot of cheap aftermarket performance for the blaster which will make it very fast. it also depends on where you ride because some places dont let you ride two strokes during certain times of the year (apllies in cali). id suggest the blaster because they are cheap, reliable, and you can easily make em fast.
Jul 17, 2005 | 11:56 PM
#75
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 222
Likes: 1
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
Originally posted by: nitsud
the 300ex is a drop in the bucket compared to the blaster. my stock 1997 is faster than the 300ex by far. i pass my step-dads z-400 with almost no problem plus you haveto do very little to maintain them go with a blaster
the 300ex is a drop in the bucket compared to the blaster. my stock 1997 is faster than the 300ex by far. i pass my step-dads z-400 with almost no problem plus you haveto do very little to maintain them go with a blaster
Jul 19, 2005 | 06:53 PM
#76
Trailblazer
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 84
Likes: 0
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
alright here it is the 300ex will smoke a mojave
the blaster will smoke a mojave
the 300ex is mostly even with the blaster but the blaster has crap for supention.
the z250 is a ozark with difrent plastics
on the track the blaster and 300ex are around the same.
the mojave is a great trail quad
so is the 300ex
the blaster is for smaller riders
u can make any chain drive quad go faster than the compition by the sprockets.
the z250 is by far one of the best trail quads i have seen.
i have riden all of these quads and own a 300ex.
trail
1. z250
2. mojave/300ex
3. blaster
track
1. blaster/300ex
2 .mojave/z250
dunes
1. blaster
2. 300ex
3. z250
4. mojave
all around best
1. 300ex/ blaster
2. z250
3. mojave
the blaster will smoke a mojave
the 300ex is mostly even with the blaster but the blaster has crap for supention.
the z250 is a ozark with difrent plastics
on the track the blaster and 300ex are around the same.
the mojave is a great trail quad
so is the 300ex
the blaster is for smaller riders
u can make any chain drive quad go faster than the compition by the sprockets.
the z250 is by far one of the best trail quads i have seen.
i have riden all of these quads and own a 300ex.
trail
1. z250
2. mojave/300ex
3. blaster
track
1. blaster/300ex
2 .mojave/z250
dunes
1. blaster
2. 300ex
3. z250
4. mojave
all around best
1. 300ex/ blaster
2. z250
3. mojave
Jul 19, 2005 | 09:28 PM
#77
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,104
Likes: 0
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
first off the mojave will not get smoked by a 300ex...and will stay with a blaster as well...blasters suck on the track cuz of there suspension..that should be the first thing you get on a blaster...most even here are the mojave and the 300ex...the 300ex is by far the best on the trails along with the mojave...the mojave is best on the track cuz it has the best suspension out of all the quads here and have a good amount of power for a 250.....blasters are great beginners quads and great machines to start riding on...i would never say that a blaster is most even with a 300ex cuz that not right at all..REAL MOTORS HAVE VALVES...like i said best all around quads are the 300ex and mojave...the z250 is a great beginners quad as well and perfect for slow trail rding...ive ridden all quads too and have owned most of them in the pass...but no way is the mojave last like you said..
best all around
300ex/mojave
z250/blaster....thats more like it now...
best all around
300ex/mojave
z250/blaster....thats more like it now...
Jul 24, 2005 | 09:30 PM
#79
Guest
Posts: n/a
Blaster vs. Mojave vs. 300ex vs. z 250
Originally posted by: bl4cksh337
You are plain out wrong. With the money that i saved from buying a mojave or 300ex i have put a toomey b1 pipe, jet, air filter and smoke 400ex up dune hills but maybe its just rider. But anyways with the money you will save you will absolutely slaughter all of those bikes. You don't even have to put any though into that one its a no brainer. I have had my blaster since 99' and have been pushing it as hard as i could and have only had one problem. And that was because i didnt do some basic tuning and that was cleaning my carb. That was it!!! AND mojave madness you are out of your mind. You have no idea wat your talking about, I think your guessing and you have unfortunately guessed wrong!
Originally posted by: mojavemadness
king whatevr, you need to do YOUR research because i have burned 3 less than 1 year old 300ex's in EVERY dragrace. how can you compare your obsolete 282cc aircooled single over head cam engine to my high performance 249cc dual overhead cam 4 valve liquid cooled powerplant, not to mention stock 11:1 race caliber compression. don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that the 300ex is not a good machine, but it's like comparing the z400 to a 400ex, the z all out is better in every aspect. the only aspect of the mojave that is inferior to the 300ex is suspension, and that's a matter of opinion, personally i think the 300ex's suspension is a little on the soft side. blasters are about as fast stock as a 300ex and i know this from riding experience.my mojave with my mods is dead even with my best friends blaster with v force toomey pipes uni airfilter, airfilter plugs, etc. i don't think you've ever even ridden with a mojave with an experienced rider, or you would know how quick the machine really is. not that it is much faster top speed than the 300ex it is slightly and accelerates faster, ultimately being a better drag racing machine than the 300ex, or any type of riding. i raced my friends with the 300ex's and swapped bikes to see wether the rider made a difference, and it didnt. i have ridden every sport quad that is sold today and all of the discontinued legends and have a good perspective on evry one of these machines so you cant tell me that us mojave riders need to do our research. when we say our mojaves beat 300ex's were nothing but right. your engines economic design and honda's effort to make the machine as reliable as possible makes it have much less potential for improvement over the mojave because it doesnt have the DOHC liquid cooled, fastest design produced
king whatevr, you need to do YOUR research because i have burned 3 less than 1 year old 300ex's in EVERY dragrace. how can you compare your obsolete 282cc aircooled single over head cam engine to my high performance 249cc dual overhead cam 4 valve liquid cooled powerplant, not to mention stock 11:1 race caliber compression. don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that the 300ex is not a good machine, but it's like comparing the z400 to a 400ex, the z all out is better in every aspect. the only aspect of the mojave that is inferior to the 300ex is suspension, and that's a matter of opinion, personally i think the 300ex's suspension is a little on the soft side. blasters are about as fast stock as a 300ex and i know this from riding experience.my mojave with my mods is dead even with my best friends blaster with v force toomey pipes uni airfilter, airfilter plugs, etc. i don't think you've ever even ridden with a mojave with an experienced rider, or you would know how quick the machine really is. not that it is much faster top speed than the 300ex it is slightly and accelerates faster, ultimately being a better drag racing machine than the 300ex, or any type of riding. i raced my friends with the 300ex's and swapped bikes to see wether the rider made a difference, and it didnt. i have ridden every sport quad that is sold today and all of the discontinued legends and have a good perspective on evry one of these machines so you cant tell me that us mojave riders need to do our research. when we say our mojaves beat 300ex's were nothing but right. your engines economic design and honda's effort to make the machine as reliable as possible makes it have much less potential for improvement over the mojave because it doesnt have the DOHC liquid cooled, fastest design produced
Its Strange my friend had a 2001 blaster bored .20, jetted, complete toomey b1 pipe, toomey air filter and i was SMOKING him aniytime
