Originally posted by: mojavemadness
king whatevr, you need to do YOUR research because i have burned 3 less than 1 year old 300ex's in EVERY dragrace. how can you compare your obsolete 282cc aircooled single over head cam engine to my high performance 249cc dual overhead cam 4 valve liquid cooled powerplant, not to mention stock 11:1 race caliber compression. don't get me wrong, i'm not saying that the 300ex is not a good machine, but it's like comparing the z400 to a 400ex, the z all out is better in every aspect. the only aspect of the mojave that is inferior to the 300ex is suspension, and that's a matter of opinion, personally i think the 300ex's suspension is a little on the soft side. blasters are about as fast stock as a 300ex and i know this from riding experience.my mojave with my mods is dead even with my best friends blaster with v force toomey pipes uni airfilter, airfilter plugs, etc. i don't think you've ever even ridden with a mojave with an experienced rider, or you would know how quick the machine really is. not that it is much faster top speed than the 300ex it is slightly and accelerates faster, ultimately being a better drag racing machine than the 300ex, or any type of riding. i raced my friends with the 300ex's and swapped bikes to see wether the rider made a difference, and it didnt. i have ridden every sport quad that is sold today and all of the discontinued legends and have a good perspective on evry one of these machines so you cant tell me that us mojave riders need to do our research. when we say our mojaves beat 300ex's were nothing but right. your engines economic design and honda's effort to make the machine as reliable as possible makes it have much less potential for improvement over the mojave because it doesnt have the DOHC liquid cooled, fastest design produced