Sport Quads Discussions on sport quads.

BLASTER dissing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 09:26 AM
  #61  
dondiesel444's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Default BLASTER dissing

Blasters SUCK.

I used to have one, what a piece of $hit. brakes suck, suspension sucks. they are good for little kids, but I can't stand people that think Blasters are the best quad and get all offended when people talk smack about them. these people obviously haven't ever been on a REAL quad. Blaster's are only 50cc less than 250r's and lt250's but these machines are in a totally different class. Blasters are also a terrrible beginers quad, a 300ex is a much better choice, it has better brakes, susupension and reverse. I don't know why Yamaha even still makes Blasters.

when you grow up and get a real quad come back and talk $hit and maybe you can back it up then. anytime you want to race I'm there [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2004 | 03:56 PM
  #62  
YamahaRider05's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Default BLASTER dissing

I KNOW that a blaster isn't that great of a machine (especially before they had hydraulic breaks). I complain about my blaster, that is why I am going to be getting a Banshee soon. A blaster is not fast, but for some people that is all they got. The only reason people get mad over this topic is because the blaster is all they have ever ridden, owned. When ever someone disses your only quad, that doesn't make people too happy.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ahtatu
General Chat
9
Sep 28, 2015 12:14 PM
nastyblaster100
General Chat
2
Sep 13, 2015 01:19 PM
1966F100
Yamaha
5
Aug 21, 2015 07:10 PM
scott1988
Yamaha
9
Aug 18, 2015 08:44 AM
315blaster
Other ATV Topics
0
Aug 8, 2015 08:13 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:13 AM.