300 ex's are terrible
#11
No $hit man its not what you expected because your comparing to to a Banshee! Youve rode very powerful quads and all of a sudden you hop on a 300ex and expect it to feel the same. The 300EX is for people starting off who want a more powerful quad then the 250. I guess if the 300EX is bad so is the 250EX,mojave,lakota,trailblazer,warrior,blaster. Please tell me if im wrong.
#12
actually i was comparing it to the sx, and i rode the 300 before i rode the banshee. and those quads are for people at arent that great at riding quads yet. and we have rode in a very technical trails, lots of hills, bank turns, woops, and other stuff, but the whole time i was on his *** with the sx, and my friend was on my *** with the banshee.
#13
You were all over the 300 ex with your 250sx and the other guy was all over you with the banshee sounds like you have no clue what you are talking about to me but that is just my opinion, Dont mean to make you bad or nothing but how can you judge the 300 and then say the banshee was all over you that doesnt make sense it sounds like you are saying the you are faster than the banshee.
#14
no you idiot, the 300 wasin front, then me, the the banshee, then the kdx, then the 200. these were not in any specific order, except the person with the 300 new the trails. ok fo you understand, or do i have to explain once again. i was on the 300's ***. the banshee was on my ***. the kdx and the xr was a lil behind.


