Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

Suzuki LT250r information

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
telephed2600's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki LT250r information

Hey iam looking at an LT250r for my first quad. I've read around and iam 99.9% sure that this is what i'll get. Iam about 5'8" and 160lbs. Iam looking at one that needs a little work for around 800-900. Any particular year i should get? I've ridden quadsports 230's and blasters, i find them too slow. I currently have a cr125. I mainly do trail riding and powerlines, the torque proabably wont be an issue. Just gimme as much info as you can on the LT, thanks.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 04:26 PM
  #2  
Slacker1bob's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 835
Likes: 2
Default Suzuki LT250r information

85/86 are good, just look for cracks around the suspension areas and swingarm. 87-92 are better but more expensive. I own an 86 and it does just fine for me.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 04:33 PM
  #3  
telephed2600's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki LT250r information

Nice looking quad! Noticed the paddles, your lucky to live near dunes!
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 06:29 PM
  #4  
Slacker1bob's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 835
Likes: 2
Default Suzuki LT250r information

Thanks.
Around here, that is about the only place you can ride, unless you wanna risk getting stopped by cops. Not many (legal) open trails
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #5  
telephed2600's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki LT250r information

haha legal... yeah riding is a crime punishible by death in my town, but everyone just runs from the police so it doesnt really matter.
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 09:10 PM
  #6  
EndlessMike's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki LT250r information

My best friend rides an 87 LT 250R. Its a great quad for the money. He bought it for around $1500, but the top end went because he went too long on an old top end (and I mean old). We bored it .40 over and went with a Wiseco piston and now that kicker is hard as a rock and the bike starts first kick. Its quicker than a Honda 250R in a drag, but the Honda handles better. The 86 didnt hae the powervalve like the 87 so low end may be a problem. The 87 has plenty low end. Check the frame for cracks, especially by the A arms. Its a great quad, enjoy it!
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 09:19 PM
  #7  
Slacker1bob's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 835
Likes: 2
Default Suzuki LT250r information

I have never complained about the low end of my 86. Many people seem to gear up though, so that will hurt low end
 
Reply
Old Sep 22, 2003 | 10:25 PM
  #8  
teoamaru's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 216
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki LT250r information

Slacker, what do you think about your PWK 35? did it make a noticable difference in power? I'm trying to decide what type of carb to buy for my 86.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 12:03 AM
  #9  
LT250R87's Avatar
Trailblazer
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Default Suzuki LT250r information

Definitely get an '87 or newer. You'll be glad you did. There's a lot more parts available for the '87 and up, and especially after '88. The '87 has a different reed cage than the 88-90. 91-92 got a new swingarm and linkage and are defninitely the best years, but anything above '87 is the way to go.
 
Reply
Old Sep 23, 2003 | 12:38 AM
  #10  
Slacker1bob's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 835
Likes: 2
Default Suzuki LT250r information

Dont overlook the 85 and 86. Mine beats pipe z400's up hills in Glamis.
teoamaru
The PWK35 did seem to add more snap and top end. I originally had the stock carb that was bored to 36mm and it worked good, then I tried a 38mm quadzilla carb. IT added more power, but it was physically big and hit the engine case. Also it leaked like crazy. Finally I totally switched up and went to Keihin and even though it is smaller than the other carbs, it seem to put out the most power. I love it. Also, it fit on the quad better than the 38mm and any bigger Keihin wont fit in the engine.
I did however have to put a Boyeson float bowl on to make it fit right, otherwise, the vent tubes of the stock bowl, hit the engine.
I would like to find another 35pwk and have it bored to 36.5 and give it a try as well.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
r1pilot83
Utility ATVs
15
Nov 25, 2019 11:39 PM
Sassinm1
General Chat
1
Sep 30, 2015 04:23 AM
Levi Enstad
General Chat
1
Sep 26, 2015 08:00 AM
Halffast17
Introduce Yourself
1
Sep 11, 2015 02:30 PM
ATVC Correspondent
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
0
Sep 1, 2015 11:59 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:32 AM.