Yamaha blaster vs. z250
#21
Yamaha blaster vs. z250
Originally posted by: Trinity748
Man all you 4-stroke people are wussies, there is no reason you need a electric start or a reverse for that matter! If you can't kick start ur bike you should'nt be riding it, and if you can't get ur fat a** off to back it up you should be running not riding...SHeesh
Man all you 4-stroke people are wussies, there is no reason you need a electric start or a reverse for that matter! If you can't kick start ur bike you should'nt be riding it, and if you can't get ur fat a** off to back it up you should be running not riding...SHeesh
Meanwhile back on the farm. There is No doubt that the Blaster is faster and accelerates quicker. The difference comes when you have to Stop (Newer Blasters are way better than the older ones), Turn, and do any kind of Technical Riding. One of the biggest downfalls of the Blaster is it's outdated Suspenssion and TIRES (From the 3 wheeler era.).
#22
Yamaha blaster vs. z250
I do agree that "wussies" comment was not needed.
Do you really think a blaster warrants electric start?
Adding that feature would negatively impact it's two biggest assets, light weight and low cost.
I believe that electric start would be a negative in the overall picture for a Blaster.
Do you really think a blaster warrants electric start?
Adding that feature would negatively impact it's two biggest assets, light weight and low cost.
I believe that electric start would be a negative in the overall picture for a Blaster.
#25
Yamaha blaster vs. z250
04SuzukiZ250 is there any way that u can send me a picture of ur Z with the heelguards removed? Well my Z-250 was clocked at 58 mph with all the bumpers, skids, and headlight setup removed running on a mix of pump gas and stp octane boost the mixture totaled at about 104 octane.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)