Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

Yamaha blaster vs. z250

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 02-21-2004, 09:08 PM
RPM's Avatar
RPM
RPM is offline
Pro Rider
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,075
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster vs. z250

Originally posted by: Trinity748
Man all you 4-stroke people are wussies, there is no reason you need a electric start or a reverse for that matter! If you can't kick start ur bike you should'nt be riding it, and if you can't get ur fat a** off to back it up you should be running not riding...SHeesh
You have truly inspired me with your profound wisdom. H*ll I say lets take it one step further. Who even needs a stupid Kick Starter? I say if you are a real Man, you should push start your Quads, and none of that down hill Pu$$y stuff either!!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]

Meanwhile back on the farm. There is No doubt that the Blaster is faster and accelerates quicker. The difference comes when you have to Stop (Newer Blasters are way better than the older ones), Turn, and do any kind of Technical Riding. One of the biggest downfalls of the Blaster is it's outdated Suspenssion and TIRES (From the 3 wheeler era.).

 
  #22  
Old 02-21-2004, 10:41 PM
BeerSmurf's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster vs. z250

I do agree that "wussies" comment was not needed.
Do you really think a blaster warrants electric start?
Adding that feature would negatively impact it's two biggest assets, light weight and low cost.
I believe that electric start would be a negative in the overall picture for a Blaster.
 
  #23  
Old 02-22-2004, 01:57 AM
suzukiz250's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster vs. z250

how fast does your guys z250 go?
 
  #24  
Old 02-22-2004, 11:26 AM
04SuzukiZ250's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster vs. z250

my z250 goes about 55. blaster do not go much faster is just the acceleration on them compared to the z's makes it feel much quicker.
 
  #25  
Old 02-22-2004, 11:44 AM
GTFZ250's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 489
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster vs. z250

04SuzukiZ250 is there any way that u can send me a picture of ur Z with the heelguards removed? Well my Z-250 was clocked at 58 mph with all the bumpers, skids, and headlight setup removed running on a mix of pump gas and stp octane boost the mixture totaled at about 104 octane.
 
  #26  
Old 03-25-2004, 08:20 PM
TomZ250's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Yamaha blaster vs. z250

I belive there is a z250 profile/page with pictures of the heel gaurds off, i dont know who tho
tom
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ATVC Correspondent
Yamaha
0
09-17-2015 03:06 AM
nastyblaster100
General Chat
2
09-13-2015 01:19 PM
ATVC Correspondent
Yamaha Side by Sides
2
09-08-2015 01:43 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: Yamaha blaster vs. z250



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:10 PM.