Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

which is better?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
Vinson581's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,261
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

OH and RideorbeRiding, i dont see any pictures of your bikes?? of your big bikes i should say. +++ i see a banshee as you avi, so your a yammi guy(nothing bad) just why say something like that when you cant back it up?

v581
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:18 PM
  #12  
Z400rider66's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

Originally posted by: Aaran
z250 is better. the blaster sucks. my friend used to have one. he bought it from z400rider66. they are slow and i hate the way its set up.

its kick start and i dont like the gearing on it.

just my opinion.
Hey Aaran that blaster ran awesome for me. Yes you do have to replace the brakes a lot but the only reason that blaster now runs like crap is Mike put that crap oil in it. To answer the question I'd say if you have mechanical skill you will have more fun out of a blaster but if you're looking for a reliable four stroke go with the Z250.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #13  
Aaran's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

he said he was running premium gas in it and some kind of special oil, but i dont know what it was.

doesnt matter anymore. i think he sold it. i know he has a raptor now. what a piece of sh!*(the raptor.)
i guess its an 02 and stock except for skids and nerfs. havent seen it yet.

hes gonna kill himself on it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:38 PM
  #14  
Aaran's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

oh yeah, vinnie do u have a lot of trails around ur house?
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 03:45 PM
  #15  
Aaran's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

Originally posted by: Z400rider66
Originally posted by: Aaran
z250 is better. the blaster sucks. my friend used to have one. he bought it from z400rider66. they are slow and i hate the way its set up.

its kick start and i dont like the gearing on it.

just my opinion.
Hey Aaran that blaster ran awesome for me. Yes you do have to replace the brakes a lot but the only reason that blaster now runs like crap is Mike put that crap oil in it. To answer the question I'd say if you have mechanical skill you will have more fun out of a blaster but if you're looking for a reliable four stroke go with the Z250.
no kidding. i was at concord club w/ elliot, tek, and mike. elliot and tek went off one way and me and mike took the hard way down the hill. now mikes not that good. so i ended up monervouring(?) it down the hill, through ruts that were 18'' deep. it sucked just like that, but with no brakes it was he!!.

we'll have to go riding sometime. u might get to ride a real machine lol[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 04:10 PM
  #16  
TheWeedman's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,424
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

blaster is way more thrilling. if u got to test ride them both u would love the powerband in the blaster. im tellin u man.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 04:20 PM
  #17  
Z400rider66's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

Originally posted by: Aaran
oh yeah, vinnie do u have a lot of trails around ur house?
Not around my house, but from my house I can get to trails by Bergulunds that go all over the place, from Humphrey all the way to Alleghany and at Ski wing which is in alleghany their is a nice tabletop I should show you. If you're not too scared to clear it. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 04:22 PM
  #18  
Z400rider66's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

Aaran we'll also have to go to kowsky's track sometime and race. He's got some pretty big jumps and its a nice track. I went over there the other day. Definitely need to tighten up my front shocks though, my back shock is fine but I didn't have the tool to adjust the front so I was bottoming out a lot. Thats why I was asking about aftermarket shocks.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 05:16 PM
  #19  
Aaran's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 358
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

yeah for what u do u really odnt need elkas. they are nice, but unneeded. go to football tomorrow and we could arrange some time for me to truck a real ride [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]over to ur house or something.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 05:34 PM
  #20  
Eric250EX's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Default which is better?

there both great machines and each have there strong points, ones is a 4 and the other is a 2 stroke. depending on what you like better that can help too. the z is mutch easier to ride and maintain and is more of a starter quad than the blaster. out of the 2, with the riding i do around where i like i would get the blaster
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:49 AM.