what is better a z-250 or a blaster?

 

you suck and your quad sucks too(it's ok I know this kid)

 

a blaster has more hop up parts and it has a fast top speed and better take off..its a 2 stroke and the z is a four

 

Kid they both suck the blaster is ancient and is chain driven and the 250 is weak grow some ***** and get something bigger

 

z250 is better. the blaster sucks. my friend used to have one. he bought it from z400rider66. they are slow and i hate the way its set up.

its kick start and i dont like the gearing on it.

just my opinion.

 

The z is easy to maintain and ride. The blaster is a high mantenece kickstart two stroke. The blaster has bad suspension.

 

Last time I checked, chain drive was the best way to go.

Not everyone needs/wants/can have the latest greatest and fastest atv. Grow up.

The blaster is an excellent atv, so is the z250. If you want a gas and go machine, get the z. If you want speed and upgradeability get the blaster. Its still easy to maintain, but does require a bit more attention than the z.

 

He probably couldn't afford a bigger quad. i couldn't, that's why i got my Z250. grow up

 

Yes chain driven is better. To get more bang for your buck, I would go for the blaster, but I just like 2 strokes. Hey look into the lt250 there wanna the fastest 250's out there.

 

it redicilous for you to make a statement like that, or did your mommy, and daddy just go out and buy you everything, besides, some things come first before quads, and if he is lucky enough to get either thats awesom, personally i would go with the z, it is new handles better, and is a more stable predictable quad, + very reliable, the blaster is 2 stroke, and always needs some matience, the blasters(older) brakes are horrific, and the shocks are that of the banshee, and that is stoneage.

v581