King Quad Review
#12
King Quad Review
Originally posted by: KegCan
I never liked suzuki, but this Quad is set up nice. I wanted the BF750 but it's missing key features like EFI and Recoil starting, plus any motor repairs should be cheaper. Looks like Suzuki did their homework, just wish they would speed up their production line.
I never liked suzuki, but this Quad is set up nice. I wanted the BF750 but it's missing key features like EFI and Recoil starting, plus any motor repairs should be cheaper. Looks like Suzuki did their homework, just wish they would speed up their production line.
#13
King Quad Review
Originally posted by: longbox
I've almost settled upon the TP as well. What concerns me is on Nyroc's website I read about a cure for bearings in the cases. I'm hoping this is cured for the new ones? I also like the solid axle as it seems simpler (less stuff to break or repair). I wanted a griz but I've read too much about CV boot and fuel boiling. I think every quad will have its problems, but like the TP the best. Also I've found good deals to be had.
For those of you who have a TP, what will it look like once that plastic front bumper cover breaks off? I'm hoping it has the same bumper as the P700 under there?
Thanks, and that's my .02
I've almost settled upon the TP as well. What concerns me is on Nyroc's website I read about a cure for bearings in the cases. I'm hoping this is cured for the new ones? I also like the solid axle as it seems simpler (less stuff to break or repair). I wanted a griz but I've read too much about CV boot and fuel boiling. I think every quad will have its problems, but like the TP the best. Also I've found good deals to be had.
For those of you who have a TP, what will it look like once that plastic front bumper cover breaks off? I'm hoping it has the same bumper as the P700 under there?
Thanks, and that's my .02
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)