lt450r
#22
Originally posted by: superevil
Oh yeah????!!!!! WELL I INSTALLED AN F-16 FIGHTER JET ENGINE ON MY KX-80 USING AN ELABORATE SYSTEM OF ROPES AND PULLEYS AND GOOD OLE DUCT TAPE. WITH A WEIGHT RATIO OF30,000 LBS OF THRUST/175LB BIKE I CAN ACCELERATE FROM 0 TO MACH 1.7 IN ABOUT 4 SECONDS,AND THATS WITH THE F*&$ING SPARK ARRESTOR IN! LETS SEE ANY YFZ OR LTR450 TOUCH ME AT THE DUNES,OR ANYWHERE!!!
Oh yeah????!!!!! WELL I INSTALLED AN F-16 FIGHTER JET ENGINE ON MY KX-80 USING AN ELABORATE SYSTEM OF ROPES AND PULLEYS AND GOOD OLE DUCT TAPE. WITH A WEIGHT RATIO OF30,000 LBS OF THRUST/175LB BIKE I CAN ACCELERATE FROM 0 TO MACH 1.7 IN ABOUT 4 SECONDS,AND THATS WITH THE F*&$ING SPARK ARRESTOR IN! LETS SEE ANY YFZ OR LTR450 TOUCH ME AT THE DUNES,OR ANYWHERE!!!
Good luck geting laid
Anyway
Hey man, the new suki450 is sick. I ride yamaha n only ridden yamaha but i gotta say the yfz better look out finally theres a nice competition going on at the track.
The only thing about it is the peashooter exhaust, really choking the motor. I would say get it man, when all the aftermarket companies start making exhaust/intake for it your lookin at woken up monster for sure.
#23
Boy you guys sure took that the wrong way-im just kidding,not being a smart ***---im not saying anything about the people who are having a serious discussion on things--- like you two are.Im poking fun at the other people who spend 7 thousand on a trail or mx quad and then argue over wich one will win in a drag race or wich one looks cooler.and even then im still kidding----to each his own i guess SO please dont take offense im just messing around
#25
Most people are somewhat disappointed when they first get it in...but once the airbox lid is removed, baffle out, cherry-bomb connected - the power different is truly amazing. I've seen the dyno charts myself as well, they don't lie. Suzuki corked it up to prevent getting sued, the fact that they took the time to make it an easily un-corked monster is awesome
#26
you guys have to be retarted to think that ltr450 only has 31 hp stock when the z400 has 28hp stock, now what would be the point of have a 450 with with the same power as the 400 lol, and suzuki claims it puts 50hp to the rear wheels stock(or the crank, correct me if im wrong)
#27
My dealer called me on friday and said they just got one in. I am going up to look at it tomorrow. Hopefully it is as sweet in person as the pictures are.
About the looks, i personally don't think it looks that bad, i think it looks alot better witht the front headlight removed. I noticed in the DirtWheels when they tested that one they had the headlight out of it and it looked alot better. JMO
About the looks, i personally don't think it looks that bad, i think it looks alot better witht the front headlight removed. I noticed in the DirtWheels when they tested that one they had the headlight out of it and it looked alot better. JMO
#28
Originally posted by: superevil
Boy you guys sure took that the wrong way-im just kidding,not being a smart ***---im not saying anything about the people who are having a serious discussion on things--- like you two are.Im poking fun at the other people who spend 7 thousand on a trail or mx quad and then argue over wich one will win in a drag race or wich one looks cooler.and even then im still kidding----to each his own i guess SO please dont take offense im just messing around
Boy you guys sure took that the wrong way-im just kidding,not being a smart ***---im not saying anything about the people who are having a serious discussion on things--- like you two are.Im poking fun at the other people who spend 7 thousand on a trail or mx quad and then argue over wich one will win in a drag race or wich one looks cooler.and even then im still kidding----to each his own i guess SO please dont take offense im just messing around
I was rolling on the floor LMAO!!! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-happy.gif[/img]
#29
yeah, that hp # sounds low. On my z paperwork it says 36.6 hp, and I believe it says 31 for the 03. I was told (by a fellow z owner) that the number was at the wheels, but it's probably at the crank. And what's the accepted # for loss, 20%? That would put mine (if it was 100% stock) at 29.4 hp at the wheels.


