Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

The 400Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 19, 2001 | 05:00 PM
  #1  
Riceburnin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Default

I just read the review of the 400z and was impressed. The motor specs should equal a motor that has great power. The suspension seems comparable to others on the market. The tires look great for all around conditions. The frames geometry appears to be very similar to the 400ex/250r frame. Maybe suzuki actually build a well handling frame, sorry suzuki lovers but they never had a sport/race quad that came close to handling with the 250r. But this one seem setup nicely. Swingarm looks very well build. I can't wait to ride one to compare it to my 400. My guess is it will do very well, and probably outperform the 400 in power and might be pretty equal in many other things. Hopefully Suzuki sells a ton of them, esepically if there priced in the 5500-6000 range.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2001 | 02:51 AM
  #2  
Slinger's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Default

I never had a problem turnin' mine and any EXs are always behind it. So much for handling. Price is what's important and I hope the motor is pumped.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2001 | 02:00 PM
  #3  
Z400's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Default

Get real. I've had 'zukis ('sports and 'racers) and Hondas. There is NO comparison in the handling department. Yes, the zukis corner fairly well, but in terms on jumping or rough terrain, Honda is the hands down winner.

Just look at Roll Design, Laeger, Lonestar, Walsh, etc. They ALL replicate Honda geometry, even 15 years after the 250r came out. If the zuki chassis was worth anything, don't you think someone would replicate it? Check out the racing scene. A year or two after the 250r came out, 90% of the races were being won by Hondas.
 
Reply
Old Oct 20, 2001 | 11:58 PM
  #4  
Quadfather's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 1,116
Likes: 0
Default

A year or two after the "R" came out, there were only three or four race quads out, plus, Honda had the money to sponsor the best riders available. Of course, we all know that it's the quad, not the rider's abilities.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2001 | 01:15 AM
  #5  
Slinger's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Default

The EXs are a dream to ride. I always fall asleep with all that excitement. That sand in your face is me.
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2001 | 01:43 AM
  #6  
bmxatv10's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
From: TN
Default

Tell 'em Quadfather!
 
Reply
Old Oct 21, 2001 | 10:10 PM
  #7  
Riceburnin's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
Default

I didn't say the suzuki's weren't fast, in fact they are actually faster than the 250r i believe. They have just not been known to handle as good as hondas, but I think this 400z might change that.
 
Reply
Old Oct 23, 2001 | 12:26 AM
  #8  
Slinger's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 978
Likes: 0
Default

The frame definitely doesn't look like the old quadracers. I like the bike, I just hope the motor isn't tamed down too much. That seems to be the habit these days.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Racing Josh
Honda
10
Dec 9, 2008 12:29 PM
jhanth
Suzuki
6
Mar 28, 2007 10:17 PM
Crashman44b
Yamaha
14
Jun 4, 2006 12:40 PM
mudslinger400z
Suzuki
3
May 20, 2003 09:30 PM
FMF
Yamaha
1
Jul 17, 2002 08:09 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.