The 400Z
#1
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I just read the review of the 400z and was impressed. The motor specs should equal a motor that has great power. The suspension seems comparable to others on the market. The tires look great for all around conditions. The frames geometry appears to be very similar to the 400ex/250r frame. Maybe suzuki actually build a well handling frame, sorry suzuki lovers but they never had a sport/race quad that came close to handling with the 250r. But this one seem setup nicely. Swingarm looks very well build. I can't wait to ride one to compare it to my 400. My guess is it will do very well, and probably outperform the 400 in power and might be pretty equal in many other things. Hopefully Suzuki sells a ton of them, esepically if there priced in the 5500-6000 range.
#3
![Default](https://atvconnection.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Get real. I've had 'zukis ('sports and 'racers) and Hondas. There is NO comparison in the handling department. Yes, the zukis corner fairly well, but in terms on jumping or rough terrain, Honda is the hands down winner.
Just look at Roll Design, Laeger, Lonestar, Walsh, etc. They ALL replicate Honda geometry, even 15 years after the 250r came out. If the zuki chassis was worth anything, don't you think someone would replicate it? Check out the racing scene. A year or two after the 250r came out, 90% of the races were being won by Hondas.
Just look at Roll Design, Laeger, Lonestar, Walsh, etc. They ALL replicate Honda geometry, even 15 years after the 250r came out. If the zuki chassis was worth anything, don't you think someone would replicate it? Check out the racing scene. A year or two after the 250r came out, 90% of the races were being won by Hondas.
#4
#7
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)