Suzuki Discussions about Suzuki ATVs.

Fantasy shootout: Now vs. then....who wins??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 12:25 AM
  #1  
ztn's Avatar
ztn
Thread Starter
|
Trailblazer
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Default

My brother semi-jokingly said after he sat on a Z400 at the dealer the otherday that it would be cool if the mags did a head to head comparison between the Z400 and the Quadracer 250 (if they could find one in mint condition!). Then paused and thought about and goes "actually, nevermind...the quadracer would kill it across the board". His logic being that a Quadsport 230/250 or Mojave or 250X woulda been an all-round mismatch against there 2 stroke racer siblings and that more displacement and power on the newer quads would make a better comparision but still fall short in overall performance. Afterall, the Mojave, quadsport and 250X were "sport" models while the T4, 'Racer and R were "high performance".

Though I agree with his logic, I disagreed on his outcome of the shootout because the mags wouldn't let quadracer win since it's not in production anymore and therefore would not benefit sales of their magazine besides the fact that it wouldn't look good for the progress of the ATV industry.

What do you think???

This would also go for KFX/KXF and EX/R comparisons.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 01:38 AM
  #2  
BomBanshee's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 322
Likes: 0
Default



<< Though I agree with his logic, I disagreed on his outcome of the shootout because the mags wouldn't let quadracer win since it's not in production anymore and therefore would not benefit sales of their magazine besides the fact that it wouldn't look good for the progress of the ATV industry. >>



I also think that would be the exact reason that the q-racer wouldnt win. And like you said it would look pretty darn bad on the new quads when a 13 year old quad can outrun the new 2003 models.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 01:40 AM
  #3  
binfordw's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 550
Likes: 0
Default

I don't think the original LT250 was/is faster than the LTZ, bud
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 01:44 AM
  #4  
BarelyLegal's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 952
Likes: 0
Default

It's not faster. A bit slower from what I recall riding them.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 04:15 AM
  #5  
2stroke4ever's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 350
Likes: 1
Default

Firstly, top speed is debatable but that's not exactly the only criteria or criteria at all for a comparison. Afterall, look at the most recent shootout in DW. I'm talking overall performance as a stock machine. I didn't pose this question for a discussion of top speed. why undermine an interesting question with such a one dimensional answer?? The question is: do you think, in &quot;like new&quot; condition, that a quadracer 250 will OUTPERFORM a Z400 in most catergories (or vice versa) in a hypothetical shootout...kinda like the '84 49ers vs. the '78 steelers.

But as for top speed, for what it's worh (nothing), the 88 'racer was clocked in a controlled top speed shootout at just under 72mph. Whether the Z equals or beats that I haven't the slightest idea. But just remember, the Tecate 4 had the highest top speed of the three 250s and it never won a shootout...so it's obviously not that important.
 
Reply
Old Jun 15, 2002 | 11:53 AM
  #6  
RedRooster's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 1999
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
Default

Once I get my Z this fall I'll get my brother to ride on of them and we'll see what happens.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MikeyBoyesq
ATV Racing
1
Nov 27, 2020 02:44 PM
ATVC Correspondent
Classifieds, Garage Sale & Swap Shop
1
Sep 16, 2015 12:24 PM
ATVC Correspondent
Riding Gear
0
Jul 7, 2015 05:03 AM
polaris scrambler00
General Chat
10
Jun 20, 2015 08:49 AM
Blodg500RX
ATV Racing
11
Apr 1, 2001 10:03 PM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.