Utility ATVs Discussions on utility ATVs.

MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #11  
Old 10-07-2005, 07:38 PM
05PRED500's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

I have the 26" Mudlite XTRs on my Outlander 800. The handle very well and handle about any terrain you throw at them. The 26" XTRs are actually a lot bigger than the 26" stock Carlisle’s. Great tires overall.
 
  #12  
Old 10-08-2005, 02:50 PM
carpenter's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 120
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

i have itp 26' 589's on my 500 ho sportsman and i love them. i did lose some top end speed but i think it was well worth it. check out my pics you can some of the stuff i ride it through.
 
  #13  
Old 10-11-2005, 01:22 PM
700vtwinman's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Baytown Texas
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

I have both and the mudlites ride better on hard pack, but the 589's are better in mud when backing up.
 
  #14  
Old 10-14-2005, 10:43 PM
XtremeSkier's Avatar
Elite Pro Rider
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 12,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

mudlites-mud....589ms-lots and lots of mud
 
  #15  
Old 10-14-2005, 11:24 PM
05PRED500's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 298
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

Originally posted by: 700vtwinman
I have both and the mudlites ride better on hard pack, but the 589's are better in mud when backing up.
You shouldn't have to back up with those two machines[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img] They should roll over just about anything!

 
  #16  
Old 10-18-2005, 11:20 PM
weez440's Avatar
Pro Rider
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,952
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

ok i was thinking bout this mud lites vs 589's thing and i came to the conclusion. if you like to do finessing around mud i would go with the mud lite's they don't have as aggressive tread pattern and they won't spin you down as fast. if you are a kamakazee rider and hold it ***** to the walls through the mud and have the power go with the 589's they clean very very well and if you keep the power up will go through alot. but if you try finessing with the 589's you slip one tire a quarter of a turn you will go down 8 inches, there is so much cleaning area it just augers down. so it depends on what kind of riding style you do.
 
  #17  
Old 10-25-2005, 03:24 PM
kj330's Avatar
Range Rover
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MUD LITES VS. 589'S???

I Have a 330 ATP with itp mudlite XL tires. These XL tires actualy weigh 1.2 pounds less than my factory Carlisle 489 tires.I even went from a 24 inch to a 25 inch and they are 1.2 pounds lighter each.There great in the snow,mud,trails,streams,and even rock crawling.. Just make sure you get the XL (they have a tread depth of 1 1/8 inch depth). the AT (is only 3/4 inch depth) I have also been hearing alot about the new Super Grip Super Light mud tire.They both say that they are the lightest 6 ply tire on the market.It has the exact same tread as the ITP Mud Lights.



ITP MUDLIGHTS XL ARE THE BEST TIRE EVER


 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MooseHenden
Family ATVing Photos
5
09-20-2015 04:14 PM
nick c
Polaris
3
09-13-2015 10:08 AM
2007 Grizzley 450
Honda
6
08-13-2015 06:33 PM
SOLOLUCKY
Polaris Ask an Expert! In fond memory of Old Polaris Tech.
3
05-25-2015 05:25 AM

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 


Quick Reply: MUD LITES VS. 589'S???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.