have fun.. i dont like 2-strokes much but out of any smaller quads.. i would choose a blaster.

 

2 strocks are better but not if your going to do alot of trail riding. plus there alot of matnence

 

I had a Blaster, '89, back in '92. It was a great quad. The only thing I did to it was add a swing arm extension to make it more stable on the top end, the wheelbase is rather short from the factory. It did everything I asked it to...just had to get the momentum up through the mud to "skip" over the top where the 4x4's just plowed through the deep stuff. It's great in tight woods!
I think it's a lot better quad now that they finally upgraded the brakes on it. The mechanical rear disk needed a lot of attention, as did the drums on the front. I'm happy to see they finally put hydraulic discs at both ends!
Enjoy your new ride!

 

look into the kawasaki mojave. It is the same in speed as the blaster stock and a 4 stroke. a lot faster than a z or ex. top speed stock is about 57 or 58 acceleration is fast cause it has a high rev engine. look into it.

 

Thanks but im sure the mojave is alot more $$$ I dont mind the 2-stoke[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]

 

why would you want to pay over 1000$ more for something goes just as fast and almost accelerates the same as a blaster.

by the way, blaster will beat it in a drag. it's that simple

 

quote by:Eric250EX
2 strocks are better but not if your going to do alot of trail riding. plus there alot of matnence


i have a blaster and i ride on the trails all the time and the only maintnce i have had to do sence ive owned it is putt gass and oil in.


go with the blaster i can beat some!!! 350 wariors and i beat an 300ex!!!

 

I love my blaster. My sis might be gettin a z. but the blaster is awsome and its great.