Now I'm feelin' some good vibes. [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

come on now when i want opinons i come here when i need help i come here ....... the adds are the only thing i get the magazine for [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]

 

Yea I used to think that way too, but after being used in a pic and write up they did on another atv site that was filled with completely untrue and misleading info etc that was actually written by one of their writers (maybe editor but not really sure) friends who was involved with the site I pretty much lost interest in their BS too. If a magazine or newspaper etc can not be unbiased and give us the "real deal" straight up everytime then how do we know what stuff to believe or not. I am not talking about messing up or a writer adding his personal opinion as thats different and cant be compared to purposely saying things in a way to make us believe that things are different then they really are etc.

I guess the ATV business is as full of BS as politics, and that pretty f'ed up.

 

i ttell u what, i love dirtwheel man. one day they' have my atv in it

 

I switched over from sportbikes to quads late last year. I had a subscription to Motor Cyclist magazine. Personally, I think Dirt Wheels can learn a lot from this magazine. I know the letters section is good, but Motor Cyclist has actual letters from people about past issues, not just with a picture saying "this is me in the mud on my 400EX," but true discussions on past articles and issues, which makes for what I belive to be much more interesting reading. MC also does have more shootouts and does compare much more products on the market. All Mag's must have adds, but I echo what everyone here is saying, too many in the past few issues.

Steve