i have never ridden a polaris scrambler or even seen one ridden so dont ridicule me if this is a crazy question. which quad would win in trails an track an dunes an drag racing, if ther stock for stock. which one is better wen u start to mod them??

 

i think the scrambler 400 would win and which 1 are u talkin about the 2 stroke 1 or the 4 stroke 1???

 

blaster

 

get a clue weedman,the scrambler will eat the blaster for lunch..i could see the blaster winning in very tight trails with a good rider,only because of how little the thing is..in a drag race,the blaster could get a head start and the scrambler would still easily win..

 

When I had a stock 400 Scrambler,I could beat blasters at the 300 ft. dirt drags.A modified 400 is no slow poke either.I had a piped raptor and raced a ported,alcohol scrambler and he run off and left me.Stong engine,no clutching.You get the picture.Being automatic,they should be great for trails.Not knocking your blaster,but the 400 really wakes up with some mods.So I'd have to give my pick to the scrambler.

 

A polaris 250trailblazer would prolly be a better match up stock for stock than the scrambler 400, The scrambler would eat the lil 200 for lunch but that is just my opinion

 

Stock Blaster will eat a HPD Trail Mod TB250 (piped and jetted with cluch kit). I know from experience - that's when I realized how peppy Blasters could be. Blasters not gonna touch a 400 except maybe on a mx track where HP doesn't count as much as rider ability and the 400 being very heavy and not the best jumper.

 

wat if the scrambler was stock an i had all the mods listed below. i dident know there was a four an two stroke version an which one is slower??

 

The 400 scrambler was a 2-stroke.The 500 scrambler was a 4-stroke.

 

wow, u thought i was serious....hmm.......