74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor
Jun 3, 2005 | 01:51 PM
#15
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,996
Likes: 0
74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor
Originally posted by: CTracingraptor
and who dynoed it?its a decent number, that all.robertson is pushing 82hp on his 727.yfz 480 are pushing 62and yfz495 on alchol is pushing 75.i know two DS's done by Mr.Hp a 800 and a 840 making 130hp and 140hp. so i woulnt brag to much.anyone care to see the dyno sheet on them, PM me.
and who dynoed it?its a decent number, that all.robertson is pushing 82hp on his 727.yfz 480 are pushing 62and yfz495 on alchol is pushing 75.i know two DS's done by Mr.Hp a 800 and a 840 making 130hp and 140hp. so i woulnt brag to much.anyone care to see the dyno sheet on them, PM me.
Jun 3, 2005 | 02:03 PM
#16
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor
i make a sout 54hp on a stock bore, but the difference between me and him is i dont post my numbers thinking they are the top. i prefer to let my bike prove itself on the hill. also if he put a 690 in that bike and spent only $1k then he didnt change the rod and that is a timebomb just waiting to happen.
Jun 3, 2005 | 04:43 PM
#17
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2000
Posts: 6,996
Likes: 0
74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor
Originally posted by: CTracingraptor
i make a sout 54hp on a stock bore, but the difference between me and him is i dont post my numbers thinking they are the top. i prefer to let my bike prove itself on the hill. also if he put a 690 in that bike and spent only $1k then he didnt change the rod and that is a timebomb just waiting to happen.
i make a sout 54hp on a stock bore, but the difference between me and him is i dont post my numbers thinking they are the top. i prefer to let my bike prove itself on the hill. also if he put a 690 in that bike and spent only $1k then he didnt change the rod and that is a timebomb just waiting to happen.
Gary
Jun 3, 2005 | 04:50 PM
#18
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 883
Likes: 0
74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor
no i like him am i on a budget, but the chances of a 690 on 11:1 to vs a stock bore on 11:1 the reliabilty is in my advantage. 690's need to have the new rod installed and it balanced. i could of easilty bored to 686 on my bike but i didn thave the extra $1200 to due teh bottom end, so i left mine safe with decent output. point in hand i really dont liek trinity, defend them if you want but their motor arent getting them no-where. but apparently he just bought his parts from trinity and built it him self. which is a different story, and i can he bike makes good power, the torque is creepy though. if i was him i would have not spent the $1000 on the fcr's and built a solid bottom end.
Jun 3, 2005 | 06:15 PM
#19
Elite Pro Rider
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 9,380
Likes: 1
74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor
Originally posted by: kevinsac961
No doubt, with enough money anything it can be done!
with all the engine work and FCR's it came to less than $1000! For that kind of power it can't be beat price wise.
I would like to have it dynoed again running on VP110 but I not willing to spend the money again for Trinitys dyno time. Maybe at next years FSW's.
No doubt, with enough money anything it can be done!
with all the engine work and FCR's it came to less than $1000! For that kind of power it can't be beat price wise.
I would like to have it dynoed again running on VP110 but I not willing to spend the money again for Trinitys dyno time. Maybe at next years FSW's.
600 for used carbs, at least 300 for cam and springs, 100+ for dyno tuning... Yeah I dont know how you could ever make that on a 1k dollar budget. I didnt even get to add the 150 dolllar piston and rings and the bore and hone job. What about filter setup?
Thats closer to a 1500 dollar build, with your own headwork and assembly. Sounds like a great bike, but I just dont see it on that kind of $$$.