74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

#31

06-04-2005, 04:15 AM

kevinsac961

Weekend Warrior

Thread Starter

Join Date: Sep 2004

Posts: 11

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor

Quote:

Originally posted by: CTracingraptor
kevin, its all making more sense now, im surprised though you got that number out of a FST 690. buy who did you head work.

im 6'4 and 250, and try to keep up, i'll loose most likely but ill look good doing it.

Mickey Dunlop at 4-Stroke Tech, that is where the engine work was done. Yeah I bet, mine used to look really sweet untill it took a 400ft tumble down a step dirt hill. I had just got my bran new all black plastics which are cracked in the front now.

Kev

Reply Like

#32

06-04-2005, 01:02 PM

garyc660R

Elite Pro Rider

Join Date: Jan 2000

Posts: 6,996

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor

Quote:

Originally posted by: CTracingraptor
gee your not the first one on the block to know that dyno sharts much cross in the 5200rom range this is nothing new to me. im not doubting the dyno curves, im saying the trinity dyno is off, thats all. and their is no damn what he build that motor for $1k, i call BS

Whats the deal here? My posting was to indicate that the dyno graph does not appear to intersect where it should.....which should cause some concern. The graph was not to school you CTracingraptor. The formulas were provided for everyone in this thread, to back up my words.

Reply Like

#33

06-04-2005, 04:31 PM

CTracingraptor

Pro Rider

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 883

Likes: 0

Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

74.3 HP 51.8 lb-ft 690 Raptor

ok gary i understand that, its kool. i thought you were trying to inform me thats all. i didnt know fst was still building raptors in that number, a while back he had a fst 727, with orange plastics they was hella good looking and it didnt make that number. but congrats, i still would have changed the rod.

Reply Like