Honda releases TRX450ER6
#21
It's to bad really, this is the machine I wanted Honda to release 2 years ago. If they had I would be riding red right now. It will be interesting to see who has the better quad in the shootouts this year, but I haven't seen any huge improvements that would make me trade in the ole Yamaha just yet[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
#22
Man, it's like bickering Democrats and Republicans basing and shifting every opinion on a party label. (Red and Blue. hahaha)
I like the analogy but, now I have to sell my Raptor! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
I like the analogy but, now I have to sell my Raptor! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
#23
Originally posted by: HappaRap
If people are really worried about a few pounds, maybe they just need to put the fork down [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-wink.gif[/img]
Originally posted by: LTZevil400 13 lbs is really gonna make a difference................Maybe Yamaha saved the weight on their customer service
#24
Originally posted by: Fahq
Man, it's like bickering Democrats and Republicans basing and shifting every opinion on a party label. (Red and Blue. hahaha)
I like the analogy but, now I have to sell my Raptor! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
Man, it's like bickering Democrats and Republicans basing and shifting every opinion on a party label. (Red and Blue. hahaha)
I like the analogy but, now I have to sell my Raptor! [img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-smile.gif[/img]
Now, now, now, don't be a sheep. If you really get the analogy, blind loyalty is pointless in both areas. I don't prejudge brands or Parties. But I do dislike certain models and politicians (Jesse Jackson and Santorum for example). There's a difference. The nice part about being independent is that you don't need to think one side is always right.
I thought the 400EX was a lazy parts bin quad with low standards that didn't deserve to be sold for more than one year after Honda saw the market for sports quads was still there and I never liked the Raptor 660 because it was a heavy-feeling, wheelie-crazy clutz. I can also easily say as Kawi Guy that I'm disappointed that Kawi's been quite lazy in the sport quad market lately: one genuine new ATV since all these machines started coming out: the KFX700 and I'm not crazy about that one either.
The best "fresh new idea" sport quads when they came out where the Quadracer 250 and 500, the Blaster, the LT80 and the Mojave. Recently, it's been the Cannibal (1st super fast 4 stroke AND EFI...too bad it had a lot of glitches), The Z400 (for exposing the 400EX for what it was) The YFZ450 (really raised the bar) and the new Outlaw (Independent rear suspension).
Maybe when the KFX450 comes out, I'll be able to tip my head to them (maybe).
#25
To tell ya the truth, I don't think that new Outlaw IRS will raise the standard much. I have a feeling maintenence (upkeep), reliability, price, and weight will become a problem. Also the only real use for suspension like that would be for hardcore XC or 4x4ing. IRS belongs on 4x4's, not sport quads! Making a bike that only takes advantage of it's new design in ONE area (XC) isn't a good idea. How many people have problems keeping both tires on the flat ground in MX, dunes, trail riding, baja, and etc.....NOONE because there's no obstacles in the way to make use of the system. It's just a marketing gimic if you ask me.
*Also, I believe it might decrease stability and make it more tippy on turns. The straight axle is what keeps quads so stable on fast turns by keeping the frame from leaning or tilting. Think about entering a turn really fast with IRS, the top of the quad will lean to the outside of the corner, possibly dumping the rider and quad.
*Also, I believe it might decrease stability and make it more tippy on turns. The straight axle is what keeps quads so stable on fast turns by keeping the frame from leaning or tilting. Think about entering a turn really fast with IRS, the top of the quad will lean to the outside of the corner, possibly dumping the rider and quad.
#27
Originally posted by: RoostItUp
To tell ya the truth, I don't think that new Outlaw IRS will raise the standard much. I have a feeling maintenence (upkeep), reliability, price, and weight will become a problem. Also the only real use for suspension like that would be for hardcore XC or 4x4ing. IRS belongs on 4x4's, not sport quads! Making a bike that only takes advantage of it's new design in ONE area (XC) isn't a good idea. How many people have problems keeping both tires on the flat ground in MX, dunes, trail riding, baja, and etc.....NOONE because there's no obstacles in the way to make use of the system. It's just a marketing gimic if you ask me.
*Also, I believe it might decrease stability and make it more tippy on turns. The straight axle is what keeps quads so stable on fast turns by keeping the frame from leaning or tilting. Think about entering a turn really fast with IRS, the top of the quad will lean to the outside of the corner, possibly dumping the rider and quad.
To tell ya the truth, I don't think that new Outlaw IRS will raise the standard much. I have a feeling maintenence (upkeep), reliability, price, and weight will become a problem. Also the only real use for suspension like that would be for hardcore XC or 4x4ing. IRS belongs on 4x4's, not sport quads! Making a bike that only takes advantage of it's new design in ONE area (XC) isn't a good idea. How many people have problems keeping both tires on the flat ground in MX, dunes, trail riding, baja, and etc.....NOONE because there's no obstacles in the way to make use of the system. It's just a marketing gimic if you ask me.
*Also, I believe it might decrease stability and make it more tippy on turns. The straight axle is what keeps quads so stable on fast turns by keeping the frame from leaning or tilting. Think about entering a turn really fast with IRS, the top of the quad will lean to the outside of the corner, possibly dumping the rider and quad.
#28
I personally think with the adjustments to this years trx450r it should be neck and neck or accelerate faster than the yfz. And with regards to the weight just like others have mentioned...put the fork down or that would be the equivalent of someone riding a yfz with a loaded backpack and the guy on the 450r nothing. All depends on the scenario and how you look at...like a heavy rider vs lighterrider but the lighter rider on the heavier machine is still lighter then the heavier rider on the lighter machine.
#30
Originally posted by: garyc660R
Why so closed minded guys? No one has ANY idea as to how the IRS on the outlaw performs. IMO, you are probably looking at the future of atving.
Why so closed minded guys? No one has ANY idea as to how the IRS on the outlaw performs. IMO, you are probably looking at the future of atving.


