Blaster 200 vs a ????????
#21
04-05-2006, 08:15 AM
Blaster 200 vs a ????????
fastest kid around,
In a drag race, mine vs. yours, it depends how both of ours are geared, i think if we were geared the same way i would win only because my whole engine is modded, it flows freely, It depends on the race we would do, on sand if we both had paddles i think you would beat me (if we both had the same gearing) If we raced on street or hard packed i think i would beat you, Im actually excited to see you mod your blaster it sounds fun.
In a drag race, mine vs. yours, it depends how both of ours are geared, i think if we were geared the same way i would win only because my whole engine is modded, it flows freely, It depends on the race we would do, on sand if we both had paddles i think you would beat me (if we both had the same gearing) If we raced on street or hard packed i think i would beat you, Im actually excited to see you mod your blaster it sounds fun.
#22
04-05-2006, 08:33 AM
Blaster 200 vs a ????????
Let me just say that you guys are sure quick to jump on my comment about what class the blaster would be in. But I would sugest re-reading what I posted before getting all hot and bothered.
And by the way, with the few mods in my sig that is on my sons 03' Blaster, it will run with stock 400ex's all day long. Been there done that!!
And by the way, with the few mods in my sig that is on my sons 03' Blaster, it will run with stock 400ex's all day long. Been there done that!!
#23
04-05-2006, 03:56 PM
#25
04-05-2006, 05:18 PM
Blaster 200 vs a ????????
Originally posted by: paintballbanshee
well, my warrior would beat your blaster, but in this thread we are talking all stock, of course if you mod any of those bikes, they can beat anything, My warrior has je piston kit, heavy valves, heavy cam, fmf full system powerbomb with powercore 4, k&n w/o lid w/filtercover, lol lots of stuff and before i did the gearing it was hitting 68 miles per hour, now that i geared it down it hits 64 but NASTYY acceleration, im talkin nasty.. i cat out run stock rappy 660's
well, my warrior would beat your blaster, but in this thread we are talking all stock, of course if you mod any of those bikes, they can beat anything, My warrior has je piston kit, heavy valves, heavy cam, fmf full system powerbomb with powercore 4, k&n w/o lid w/filtercover, lol lots of stuff and before i did the gearing it was hitting 68 miles per hour, now that i geared it down it hits 64 but NASTYY acceleration, im talkin nasty.. i cat out run stock rappy 660's
#26
04-05-2006, 06:41 PM
#27
04-06-2006, 01:07 AM
#28
04-06-2006, 06:20 AM
Blaster 200 vs a ????????
omg! No respect what so ever for the blaster :-(..Anyways here is a good one for you fellas viewing pleasure
vrmmm vrmmm
Theres not a rap 350(without a Motor swap) on the earth going to run with this thing lol
vrmmm vrmmm
Theres not a rap 350(without a Motor swap) on the earth going to run with this thing lol
#29
04-06-2006, 08:31 AM
#30
04-06-2006, 11:47 AM
Blaster 200 vs a ????????
Well, I watched those videos, and I think it proves my point about rider skill, as most of the videos where the Blaster wins it appears that the riders on the other machines really didn't have enough skill in sand drags to be competative with thier machines. Also, gearing is a huge factor in drag racing - especially if it's only 300 ft. How fast do you think your "trap speed" is at the end of the 300 feet? I have a Banshee that is geared stock, and plenty fast. If I drop the gearing on it, I'd easily make it much faster in acceleration (for dragging) but lose my close to 80 mph top end. So even with NO ENGINE WORK, gearing can give a huge advantage.
Watch the last video that says "......good job Ryan..." - it appears as if the Blaster is racing a Banshee that looks slightly modified, but close to stock. The Blaster gets him off the line, but then the Banshee passes him just before the cones. Imagine if the drag was for a greater distance just how much more the Banshee would have pulled away....... you can't cheat the laws of physics. A 200cc machine cannot compete with a 400cc machine without sacrificing something - reliability, rideability, etc. However, the Blaster DOES have something going for it in the fact that it is a 2-STROKE. This allows it to have comparable power to a 300-350cc 4-stroke machine (stock). And it's cheap, about $3000 new, compared to $5000 for a Raptor 350 or something comparable. But, you give up a few things too(like reverse), so it depends on what type of riding you do.
Like I said before, rider skill is just as important as the machine......
Watch the last video that says "......good job Ryan..." - it appears as if the Blaster is racing a Banshee that looks slightly modified, but close to stock. The Blaster gets him off the line, but then the Banshee passes him just before the cones. Imagine if the drag was for a greater distance just how much more the Banshee would have pulled away....... you can't cheat the laws of physics. A 200cc machine cannot compete with a 400cc machine without sacrificing something - reliability, rideability, etc. However, the Blaster DOES have something going for it in the fact that it is a 2-STROKE. This allows it to have comparable power to a 300-350cc 4-stroke machine (stock). And it's cheap, about $3000 new, compared to $5000 for a Raptor 350 or something comparable. But, you give up a few things too(like reverse), so it depends on what type of riding you do.
Like I said before, rider skill is just as important as the machine......