looking to buy a new bike and have narrowed it down to a 660 or a 450 grizzly. i have a 2004 450 now and love it. is the 660 too big?? i do mostly trail riding and hunting. any thoughts??

 

go with the 660 or 700 if you can afford it. I would say atleast the 660 since you already had a 450, that way you dont wish down the road you got something different. just my opinion.

 

Since you already have a 450, I would go with the 660. Yes it is a bigger bike physically than the 450, but not by much. If you look at the specs for to two, there is not much difference in weight either, maybe 10 or 15 pounds. It is nice to have the additional power and not need it, than to need the power and not have it. The 660 is a great all around big bore bike, I love mine.

 

660 Definetly , much more powerful and still good handling in the woods.

 

We have both, and while the 660 has a lot more power, I'll take the 450 out just because it's lighter and it doesn't seem like you're driving a car around. I love the grizz, but usually the kodiak is more than enough. Also, I'd look out for the '03 grizzlys. There are a few issues with that year that everyone (including me) have dealt with.