my buddy thinks that he can bore his blaster over 90 with out the cilender walls cracking..

and he thiks his blaster bored over 40 with a full fmf exhust sytem can beat a 1998 300ex that is bored over 30 with cams dg exhast stage 2 jet KnN air filter and drilled air box...

what do u guys think...

ps.. i hate yamaha i love honda....

 

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>Originally posted by: richard212

my buddy thinks that he can bore his blaster over 90 with out the cilender walls cracking..



and he thiks his blaster bored over 40 with a full fmf exhust sytem can beat a 1998 300ex that is bored over 30 with cams dg exhast stage 2 jet KnN air filter and drilled air box...



what do u guys think...
</end quote></div>

Race him and see.

<div class="FTQUOTE"><begin quote>
ps.. i hate yamaha i love honda....</end quote></div>

I don't care.

 

300EX's are slow. I think the Blaster will beat the 300EX, anytime. Blaster's run right behind a Warrior, which is a 350.

 

I had a 250x with high compression piston,cobra exhaust,uni filter and re-jetted.I could beat a blaster but I couldnt start to beat a 300ex.My vote is for the 300ex.Let us know who wins.Oh and I guess I like hondas and yamahas

 

Hmmm, given the blaster is a two stroke... I'd have to go with the mosquito killer. The real quesiton is why do you care who is the faster of the two. Sounds to me like a P-ing contest.. and both of you will get wet. Just enjoy the fact that you can ride and have fun.. who is fastest is moot...

 

The blaster would eat the 300ex. 300ex's are slow.