BLASTER vs WARRIOR
#2
If they are completely stock, the warrior would win every time.
This is not a biased opinion either.
There are alot more mods that can be performed on a blaster though.
I myself bought a warrior brand new in 96. i was 14, i am now 18. i would never buy a blaster, because i am 6'6" tall, and a blaster is wwwwaaaayyy tooo small. i have beat the snot out of my warrior and it has taken all of the abuse. I am a very satisfied customer.
This is not a biased opinion either.
There are alot more mods that can be performed on a blaster though.
I myself bought a warrior brand new in 96. i was 14, i am now 18. i would never buy a blaster, because i am 6'6" tall, and a blaster is wwwwaaaayyy tooo small. i have beat the snot out of my warrior and it has taken all of the abuse. I am a very satisfied customer.
#3
#4
I used to own an 88' blaster and now have a 00' warrior. The warrior is faster (acceleration & top speed)but the biggest thing I noticed is how much more stable it is at high speeds(due to a longer wheelbase and better susp.)Also on my local MX track there is a set of doubles that I could never do on the blaster, and my first time out on the warrior I did them over and over. This was mostly because the blaster was bouncing around on the approach and the warrior could accelerate over the small bumps.But I wish I didn't have to sell the blaster to buy the warrior,It wheelies way easier and slices&dices through the trees better.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)