warrior vs mojave vs lakota vs polaris 2x4
#4
#5
Cramman I'm sorry, but I knew you probably posted this on all three forums so I had to check! Believe you me a stock Warrior will NOT do 65-70.Period. And Tooey unless yours is not stock you are not doing 65, but maybe 60. The Mojave will do 57 and stay within about a quad or two of the warrior until they top out. Now if you race about a 2 mile run then yes the warrior will kill it. Other than that it will be real close. I spent $100 of the $1,000 I saved on the Mojave and bought a jet kit and filter and I will beat a stock Warrior. That in itself is pretty damn good in my opinion.
2000 Mojave
2001 TrailBoss
2000 Mojave
2001 TrailBoss
#6
Those old polaris 2-strokes go faster then people seem to think, I had an old 350 that was bone stock and it would easily do 55+++, Im not going to say exactly how fast it would go cuz I'd never hear the end of it... I'd say they all are a pretty even match. If its of any use one of my friends has a 97 lakota, he's a better driver than me, I'd smoke him all day long on the 350L, believe it or not.
#7
Trending Topics
#10
Well, this is funny. I have owned a Warrior for several years, as well as a Blaster. Have ridden with a friend who has a sport 400 (Polaris). First off my Warrior stomps the heck out of my FMF piped K&N equipped Blaster. (blaster does feel faster tho) The Sport 400 easily beats the Warrior for acceleration and top speed. Would still take the Warrior every time over the sport tho, to me it's very awkward. The Lakota is not a very fast or quick machine but is a nice ride. Tho Mojave is in line with a stock Blaster for power. Not guessing here folks it's just fact.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mojave250A
Performance Mods and Project Quads
1
07-11-2015 10:38 AM
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)