WHICH ONE IS A BETTER MACHINE.

 

Warrior

Larger-important if you really are "BIGbillybob"

Better brakes-front disk

Reverse-self expanitory

4-stroke=reliability and ease of maintanance

My warrior with a pipe and K&N was a dead heat against Blasters with K&N, reeds, and a pipe. That was despite riders on the Blasters that were 30-50lbs. lighter than I was.

 

my brother had a warrior and i have a blaster, the blaster is faster and it is very reliable (air cooling) it has a oil injector (no mixing gas) if your a larger guy u might want to get a warroir the blaster is built for smaller people i'm 5'8" 180# and it goes great but i feel more comfortable on my quadracer (bigger) the only downfall of the blaster is the brake ,they SUCK !!!

 

The Warrior is faster,better brakes, pretty good power, good hillclimber and if your a bigger rider the warrior has more room. THe blaster is just as good except its a little smaller and does't have the best brakes.

 

I currently own and ride both a Blaster and Warrior.

Warrior:
For every size person
Relibale
Good Brakes
Kinda gets heavy in really tight spots (but not bad)
Good mudder
Low end torque

Blaster:
Faster than warrior
Relibable
Not the best mudder
sometimes looses traction because it is soo light (also has to do w/ the power)
Must stay in the managable power range

For Normal sized people. Although VERY big people like to ride them also...

It depends on what you want it for.

 

I hate to say this but the blaster in not faster than a warrior.

 

blaster definitely not faster than warrior. the blaster is to boxxy. The warrior is a mean all around machine. Less maintance with the warrior too.