Yamaha Discussions about Yamaha ATVs.

Too big for Blaster???

Old Aug 29, 2002 | 12:08 AM
  #1  
BLAZIN325TrailTank's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

Am I too big for a blaster? 6 ft tall 205 lbs

I want to get a sport quad but do not want to pay a fortune for a quad. I have only ridden a Blaster once and like the way it felt but my wife said it looked too small for me. I am used to riding a big quad but I do not want another big quad.(Polaris) I have nothing against them but their size. I have had my TrailBoss for 2 years with no problems other than replacing the chain dues to high center on a log with a fence in it.

How dependable is a Blaster? I ride a couple times a Month with friends and would ride it to work when it is nice out.

Any input will be nice. Thanks
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 01:03 AM
  #2  
THEMOOSE's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 2,272
Likes: 0
Default

I would think your a bit too big for a blaster.
Most people I see with blasters are under 150lbs & quite a bit shorter.

If you want a compact quad go with a Shee.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 03:55 AM
  #3  
hot_shoe_cv's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Jul 1999
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 1
Default

The facts are that the Blaster is an entry level quad* designed for about 5' 10" & 150 lbs or less. Any significant size over that would not only overtax the already marginal suspension plus minimizing the amount of body movement possible necessary for serious riding.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 09:31 AM
  #4  
02BAJA's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Default

I beg to differ. I am 5'-9" and 220 and I ride a Blaster. Granted I look like a monkey F-ing a football on it, but that thing is a blast to ride in trails. Especially when your used to wrestling around a bigger quad.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 10:08 AM
  #5  
jlpier01's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 338
Likes: 0
Default

I have had the same dilemma. I want a smaller sporty quad. I have even been looking at bikes, but my wife says NO.

I have looked into warriors, or hoping that the big discount on new 400 Ex's will trickle down to the used ones soon.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 04:29 PM
  #6  
BLAZIN325TrailTank's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Range Rover
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
Default

I think paying more than $4 grand is too much for a new quad no matter if it has a 400 small block under the seat. It is just me, paying around $5500 for a quad that does not have reverse just does not make sense. I like the size and performance of a 300ex but I think it is a little overpriced for what you get. I like the price and performance of the blaster and even the aftermarket performance parts availibility.

I found a left over new 02 model blaster for $2650 , 3009 OTD but can not get it until I sell one or both of mine.
 
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2002 | 04:39 PM
  #7  
73Raptor's Avatar
Range Rover
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Default

I am 6'1 200 pds and I had a blaster.It was a little small feeling but it was fun as he@# to ride.But what do I know I would ride any dang thing.[img]i/expressions/face-icon-small-tongue.gif[/img]
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 10:19 PM
  #8  
RadAndy's Avatar
Weekend Warrior
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Default

I am 5'9", weigh 170 lbs and have a 2002 Blasters that I purchased in May. Although You could ride this bike and have a good time there is only so far it will take you. I am already begining to outgrown it, so I am going to add a pipe next spring. It would definetely depend on your style of riding though, I love to jump big and climb everyhing.

I have a brother who weighs 280 and has riden mine, but it will only go about 35mph with him on it. It will go 55mph with me on it. I would estmate about 45-50mph for you. That is fast enough to beat a worrior all the way into 6th gear, chew up a 300ex, and keep relatively close to a banshee in the woods. Not to mention that you can't beat the price.
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 10:28 PM
  #9  
Bing's Avatar
Super Quad Patrol
Smokes meat all the time!
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 12,479
Likes: 0
Default

take your pick

EX a safe economical bet

Im 260, 6'2",,,,,worked for me
More stable than my new Raptor
 
Reply
Old Sep 30, 2002 | 11:24 PM
  #10  
yamblaster98's Avatar
Pro Rider
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 263
Likes: 0
Default

Radandy- a blaster won't chew up a 300ex, ive owned a blaster and my best friend has a 02 300ex and they are pretty tied up, where one excells the other has some downfalls, now to the original question, i am almost 6 foot and weigh like 150, and i have no problem on a blaster, they are cheap fun quads and you can modify it pretty simply to your likings. Since you weigh 205 you are kinda big for it but i have a freind that is almost their and did fine on his for like 3-4 months. The weight limit on these things is 220 i think but just mod it up small and no problems will occur i think.
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 AM.